tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14663844454226027862023-11-16T06:48:57.857-05:00Trade It in for TwinkiesThe Michelle Forbes ReviewSparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.comBlogger42125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-36688025249077384632012-11-10T23:01:00.000-05:002012-11-19T12:16:31.469-05:00Homicide: The Movie<h4>
The Review</h4>
<blockquote>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgAwUnRhYljNSJCUyO5QmMWqaZMC7Rj4TC2WjG6MKJSv-4xVGy_sPZMLA3SqVfnina-s8w0eTxLqGHmHIld_9YWLp68HuOol9wsAweCQTeD3Ajl112TrGH137eOu4T6C6Hc9eIEpBkoj0E/s1600/homicide.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Homicide: The Movie" border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgAwUnRhYljNSJCUyO5QmMWqaZMC7Rj4TC2WjG6MKJSv-4xVGy_sPZMLA3SqVfnina-s8w0eTxLqGHmHIld_9YWLp68HuOol9wsAweCQTeD3Ajl112TrGH137eOu4T6C6Hc9eIEpBkoj0E/s200/homicide.jpg" width="141" /></a>
<br />
<div>
<div itemscope="itemscope" itemtype="http://data-vocabulary.org/Review">
<span itemprop="itemreviewed"><em>Homicide: The Movie</em></span><br />
<br />
Reviewed by <span itemprop="reviewer">Sparky Lightbulb</span> on
<time datetime="2012-11-10" itemprop="dtreviewed">November 10, 2012</time>.<br />
<br />
<span itemprop="summary">A movie for fans of the TV series</span><br />
<br />
<span itemprop="description">An assassination attempt on former Lt. Giardello [now a mayoral candidate] reunites the best of the Baltimore PD.</span><br />
<br />
Rating: <span itemprop="rating">3 of 5 stars <span style="color: orange;">★★★</span></span><span style="color: #cccccc;">★★</span></div>
<br />
<br />
Do you remember the final season of <em>Homicide: Life on the Street</em>? It was so <em>young</em>. Perhaps this adjective comes to mind because of the set redesign. Fresh paint and new furniture replaced the shabby and worn—and in the Season 6 finale, blood stained and bullet ridden—squad room that we knew. Perhaps the departure of Det. Frank Pembleton [Andre Braugher], the one stable married man, and the introduction of the stunning and single Det. Rene Sheppard [Michael Michele], a pageant winner turned cop, contributed to this youthful atmosphere.<br />
<br />
Or perhaps antics more appropriate to hormone-crazed teenagers than seasoned homicide detectives infused that last season with its immaturity. We did have Detectives John Munch [Richard Belzer] and Stuart Gharty [Peter Gerety] competing for the affections of Billie Lou [Ellie McElduff], the Waterfront barmaid. And then we watched Det. Laura Ballard [Callie Thorne] confess her crush on colleague Paul Falsone [Jon Seda], who, at first, had eyes only for the former pageant queen. When Det. Tim Bayliss [Kyle Secor] explored his bisexuality, bullying and ostracism, typical school ground behaviors, ensued. Lt. Giardello [Yaphet Kotto], empathetic to the youthful energy that filled the squad room, managed his detectives as would an affectionate teacher, and when situations required a more strict disciplinarian, Capt. Gaffney [Walt MacPherson] swaggered in, principal-style, to crush the fun.<br />
<br />
If Season 7 [1998-99] resembled high school homeroom, then <em>Homicide: The Movie</em> [2000] is graduation. We recognize the significance of the occasion—that this is it—and so enjoy the opportunity to see all of our favorites one last time. But like the freedom and possibilities that await matriculating seniors, we are itching to abandon this cohort of characters and discover what’s next on the television horizon.<br />
<br />
Kudos to writers Tom Fontana, Eric Overmyer, and James Yoshimura for concocting a story where dozens of <em>Homicide</em> characters can make reasonably logical appearances. The movie opens with our beloved Lt. Gee—now a mayoral candidate—gunned down during a campaign appearance. As news of the shooting spreads, we get to see our favorites interrupted in lives we don’t know—Stanley Bollander [Ned Beatty] having his first beer with breakfast, a bearded Bayliss fly fishing in a lonely stream, Pembleton lecturing college students on morality—all to Beck’s haunting and weird “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGdv1hVCuvg" target="_blank">Beautiful Way</a>.”<br />
<br />
A <em>Homicide</em> initiate would understand that Gee had amassed such loyalty and good will during his tenure with the Baltimore PD that detectives current, retired, fired—together with medical examiners and prosecutors—would rush to investigate the crime and punish his would-be assassin. But to a viewer unfamiliar with this world, the support Gee gets is illogical. A black politician who campaigns to make hard drugs—heroin and the like—<em>legal</em> gets law enforcement officers and prosecutors—many of whom are <em>white</em>—racing to his aid? In what universe? Try explaining those conditions to folks watching this investigation as their first introduction to the story and cast. Better to have named this “movie” <em>Homicide: The Last, Long Episode</em>, as it certainly doesn’t work as a stand-alone film.<br />
<br />
But, really, this movie is for fans. And the writing and acting are often so good that a character’s full personality blooms after a few seconds of screen time. We see, for example, that Gharty, the cowardly patrolman inexplicably promoted to homicide detective, has now made the even more illogical leap to lieutenant, where he struggles to remain afloat on his own incompetence. So that we remember the racism that plagues Baltimore (or perhaps to see the new lieutenant's bad decision making), Gharty sends two black detectives, Sheppard and Lewis [Clark Johnson], to interview the white supremacists and the white Bolander and Munch to interview black suspects on the religious fringe. The hungry press allow Mike Giardello [Giancarlo Esposito] to go Italian hothead on unfortunate reporters wanting news of his father's condition, while former Capt. Megan Russert [Isabella Hofmann], the wise mother figure, drapes her arm around anyone needing comfort.<br />
<br />
Sometimes, though, the conversation is a bit forced, like when medical examiners Drs. Cox [Michelle Forbes] and Griscom [Austin Pendleton] use their hospital visit to examine Gee’s wound and debate the caliber of weapon used. The Dr. Cox we know would have delivered a spot-on insight about life and death, or at least touched Gee’s hand, as their working relationship had demonstrated mutual respect and affection. But such are the little disappointments viewers can expect when the characters must pass the story like a baton as they sprint through the relay race to showcase seven years of cast.<br />
<br />
Of course, the most important interaction—Bayliss’s rooftop confession to Pembleton—is the most disappointing. You can’t fault Braugher and Secor’s acting. They shout, gesture, cringe, and foam with real passion. But the words themselves are flat. The characters haven’t grown. Bayliss is still a little boy needing Pembleton to be the rigid disciplinarian. And with this scene—as we try to imagine how Bayliss and Pembleton will suffer once they climb down the stairs—we know it’s time to move on. The <em>Homicide</em> characters remain in a behavior loop that has grown tiresome and old.<br />
<br />
And look at what was on the horizon! In two short years, David Simon would bring to life a Baltimore of more grit and id in <em>The Wire</em>, inarguably the best series in television history.
</div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQ2tiwymuZiJW4cNxSwLVsYZ14kmCYpcTe4bkLaIf1zyH1Ad8Em6w9vOOcHrjzr9tLkvEcjmMqHjzrgRfD_VBJFsH-yq-aZwY_GaCRqfGMqeXVxNWkv-2_Ud5uc23enGoC6YBGCWFOTXY/s1600/homicide_01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="The cast of Homicide" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjQ2tiwymuZiJW4cNxSwLVsYZ14kmCYpcTe4bkLaIf1zyH1Ad8Em6w9vOOcHrjzr9tLkvEcjmMqHjzrgRfD_VBJFsH-yq-aZwY_GaCRqfGMqeXVxNWkv-2_Ud5uc23enGoC6YBGCWFOTXY/s1600/homicide_01.jpg" width="250px" /></a> <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuPCdVUYCWNFqRgyvPmbtp2iGRMW_sIcZGAQYh9Mv0sJaVVIfESKIpUd59eGw_Id9CSGoEqkcZWvyHhq1zvmfettKDUuircH5HuRJvbfSNGbl1a6f49jU56j7njWAGEZBUY37GHyFReuE/s1600/homicide_08.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Michelle Forbes as Dr. Julianna Cox in Homicide" border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhuPCdVUYCWNFqRgyvPmbtp2iGRMW_sIcZGAQYh9Mv0sJaVVIfESKIpUd59eGw_Id9CSGoEqkcZWvyHhq1zvmfettKDUuircH5HuRJvbfSNGbl1a6f49jU56j7njWAGEZBUY37GHyFReuE/s1600/homicide_08.jpg" width="250px" /></a></blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<h4>
1 Scene</h4>
<blockquote>
<iframe allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen" frameborder="0" height="375" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-F1MVKuTvpo" width="500"></iframe></blockquote>
<h4>
To Own the Movie</h4>
<blockquote>
<em>Homicide: The Movie</em> is an easy [though expensive] purchase at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Homicide-The-Movie-Daniel-Baldwin/dp/B00005AW04/">Amazon US</a>. One option is to buy a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Homicide-The-Movie-Daniel-Baldwin/dp/B00005AW04/">single disc</a>. If you have collector issues, be careful that the seller is offering the movie release—if that's important to you—not a broken up <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Homicide-Street-Complete-Series-Repackaged/dp/B002BLNGTS/">Complete Series</a>. Or you can purchase <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Homicide-Street-Complete-Series-Repackaged/dp/B002BLNGTS/" target="_blank">Homicide: Life on the Street—The Complete Series</a>, which includes the movie together with all seven seasons.</blockquote>
<h4>
Cross Post</h4>
<blockquote>
This review exists at <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/RXR9APTEAVUQ9/" target="_blank">Amazon US</a>.</blockquote>
Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535859792737931 -81.3520002365112328.532372292737932 -81.356956736511236 28.539347292737929 -81.347043736511225tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-3755786383818450462012-06-23T23:01:00.000-04:002012-06-23T23:01:00.864-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 24<h4>
Special Message to Denny Larsen</h4>
<blockquote>
Whose grilled cheese sandwiches do you prefer now, little guy?</blockquote>
<h4>
Inappropriate Adjective</h4>
<blockquote>
I should have been "horrified" by Rosie's "senseless" murder at the hands of the "despicable" Jamie Wright and Terry Marek, but the adjective that best describes my feelings during the season finale was "delighted."<br />
<br />
At first I was smug as I watched Jamie acknowledge his involvement in Rosie's demise, but I wasn't satisfied. I had <a href="http://tradeitin4twinkies.blogspot.com/2012/05/killing-first-thoughts-killing.html" target="_blank">seen it coming</a>, and his long confession was just as lame as I expected. The Jamie we knew would have turned Rosie over to Chief Jackson, who would have convinced our young Larsen that she didn't see or hear anything important, motivating the girl's silence with a wad of extra travel money. Our Jamie, the one with whom we had spent 25 episodes, wouldn't have resorted to violence when fast talk and deal-making could have gotten him through the situation <span style="background-color: white;">successfully</span><span style="background-color: white;">.</span><br />
<br />
So I was smug—and a little disappointed—until we saw Linden poking an exploratory finger past the red tape on Terry's broken taillight—more like a trauma doctor examining a wound—and we realized that that taillight had been a beacon trying to illuminate the murderer for two whole seasons.<br />
<br />
And unlike Jamie's unmotivated actions on the night Rosie died, Terry had from the very beginning proven to be a woman who made bad choices and expected things to come easy. And what would be easier than securing her spot beside Michael Ames—whose laundry I'll bet she had never folded—than drowning a "nobody" in a lake? That Jamie couldn't push that car into the water contradicts all of the violence we saw from him earlier in the episode. That Michael Ames couldn't push the car into the lake indicates the boundary where tolerating a nagging conscience isn't worth the financial reward of the bad behavior. It was a brilliant revelation of the murderer, and I was delighted by its unexpectedness and motivated plausibility.</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Terry</h4>
<blockquote>
We're all <em>somebody</em>, Terry. You're old enough to know <em>that</em>.</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to the Writers</h4>
<blockquote>
How did Jamie get a bloody, unconscious girl out of a casino busy with patrons and staff with no cameras or witnesses spotting him? Even Chief Jackson would have stopped him before he got to the car!</blockquote>
<h4>
Too Invested</h4>
<blockquote>
TV characters have to do stupid, unmotivated things all of the time: psychiatrists have their unborn babies cut out of their bellies by crazy patients, waitresses keep horses on their apartment patios in New York City, or men risk flash-flood conditions to get tampons for their girlfriends. Usually, I don't care. It's TV, after all, not reality.<br />
<br />
<em>The Killing</em> is the first show I have ever watched where I have been invested not only in the characters and story but also in an actress associated with the show. You know, I wanted to see Michelle Forbes score her second Emmy nomination. And when I watched, week after week, her character hobbled by pointless plot, I started focusing on inconsistencies in the series as a whole. These inconsistencies—things that I would have just shrugged off in another show—bothered me so much that they ruined my enjoyment in the second season.<br />
<br />
If Mitch had been played by a different actress, I would have just used her scenes to leave the couch or zone for a couple of minutes before the action returned to the detectives. If I try to see things from the writers' perspective, I realize that they needed to get Mitch out of the house. For Terry's involvement in Rosie's murder to completely horrify us, we needed to see Terry entrenched in the Larsen home, helping to hold everything together. And to entrench her, we needed to get rid of the mom for the season. I don't understand why the writers couldn't have plotted a more interesting and revelatory adventure for Mitch, especially since the actress who brought this character to life had gained the series such positive attention in the first season. I guess Mitch's story had low priority as the writers tried to stretch the investigation over another full season.</blockquote>
<h4>
If I Were in Charge</h4>
<blockquote>
... I would never have told the audience that Rosie's killer would be revealed in the last episode of the second season. This knowledge ruined the suspense of early episodes because we knew Linden and Holder had to be pursuing just another bad lead.<br />
<br />
... I would have solved Rosie's murder in fewer episodes. [Sorry, writers, it dragged a bit in Season 2.]<br />
<br />
... I would have hired a continuity editor who made sure that new evidence fleshed out Rosie in a consistent and believable manner. Please explain to me how Jasper and Alexi both thought that Rosie hated her family when her little Super 8 production indicated that she loved them all very much?<br />
<br />
... I would have either A) lost the flashback scenes in the finale [Eric Laden and Jamie Anne Allman are both good enough actors that by monologue alone they could have painted the events of that night], or B) had flashbacks as an opening or closing device from episode 1 [Katie Findlay was quite fun to see <em>living</em>].<br />
<br />
... I would, though, renew the show. Linden and Holder are fresh and fascinating police, and we now know enough about the folks running the city to make any illegal activities these two cops encounter in the future all the more delicious. What new trouble can Chief Jackson get into? Who will fill Janek Kovarsky's place? Is Alexi about to go all young-wolf mobster, or is he on the run after executing the alpha? Will Gwen go over to the Dark Side like Darth Darren? And when is she going to let Darren know about the baby she's carrying?</blockquote>
<h4>
Word Count</h4>
<blockquote>
The number of words Mitch has spoken this season:<br />
<br />
"Reflections" = 0 words<br />
"My Lucky Day" = 0 words<br />
"Numb" = 22 words<br />
"Ogi Jun" = 0 words<br />
"Ghosts of the Past" = 108 words<br />
"Opening" = 137 words<br />
"Keylela" = 0 words<br />
"Off the Reservation" = 0 words<br />
"Sayonara, Hiawatha" = 233 words<br />
"72 Hours" = 0 words<br />
"Bulldog" = 0 words<br />
"Donnie or Marie" = 303 words<br />
"What I Know" = 142 words<br />
<br />
Grand total = 945 words</blockquote>
Until I get my lazy ass in gear and finish the review for <em>Homicide: The Movie</em>, it's sayonara, Hiawatha!Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535765537907547 -81.35212898254394528.535329537907547 -81.352745982543951 28.536201537907548 -81.35151198254394tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-62558092317620396322012-06-16T23:01:00.000-04:002012-06-16T23:01:00.236-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 23With less than 45 minutes of story remaining, it looks like Jamie, Michael Ames, or Chief Jackson is our killer—I'm not sure why Linden and Holder are zeroing in on Jamie when they just watched <em>three</em> people take the elevator to the tenth floor. But what else will the season [series?] finale bring? Time for <em>The Killing</em> final exam!<br />
<h4>
Question 1</h4>
<blockquote>
In the Season 2 finale, will Det. Holder rhyme "yo" with ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">to jail you go, bro!</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">we're going to hurt you <em>slooooow</em>.</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">drowning that girl was <em>low</em>, ya know?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">if I have to kick Chief Jackson one more time, I'm gonna break a toe!</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 2</h4>
<blockquote>
Will Mitch reunite the Larsen family by ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">applying for a spot on the reality TV show <a href="http://animal.discovery.com/tv/its-me-or-dog/" target="_blank"><em>It's Me or the Dog</em></a>?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">bribing the boys with a pet parrot and a set of nunchucks so that they prefer <em>her</em> grilled cheese sandwiches to Aunt Terry's?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">committing suicide and giving sister Terry a ready-made family whose laundry she can fold ad nauseam?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">agreeing with Stan to move to a new house where she can plant a butterfly garden in the backyard in Rosie's memory</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 3</h4>
<blockquote>
Will Gwen ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">breathe a sigh of relief that Linden and Holder quit watching the security footage once they spot Jamie in the elevator, thus missing her arrival?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">offer a quick prayer of thanks when Mayor Adams drops dead from a heart attack?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">apologize to her father before her poor choices completely ruin her future in politics?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">finally confess that she is carrying Darren's baby?</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 4</h4>
<blockquote>
Will Jamie ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">go quietly in handcuffs after Linden and Holder arrest him?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">convince Grandpa Wright to dump Darren in the trunk of <em>another</em> campaign car that they push into a <em>different</em> lake?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">note what good shape he must be in if, after chasing Rosie through the woods all night, he still had the energy to work out at the city hall gym at 4 the next morning?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">toss the handgun he found in a drawer at campaign headquarters to Darren, who blows the little punk away?</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 5</h4>
<blockquote>
Will Det. Linden ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">wake up next to Rick in Sonoma, California, trying to clear the fog of a really, <em>really</em> bad dream?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">find herself unable to stop the bleeding from Holder's bullet wound?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">discover "Bob" written on the steamy mirror in Holder's bathroom?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">find herself doodling leafless trees on Rosie's case file?</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 6</h4>
<blockquote>
How many characters will die in the Season 2 finale?<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">0</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">1</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">2</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">3½</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 7</h4>
<blockquote>
In the Season 2 finale, death(s) will occur by ... [Pick all that apply.]<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">dog bite</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">bullet</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">heart attack</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">asphyxiation from carbon monoxide</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 8</h4>
<blockquote>
Will we finally learn that Rosie ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">worked for Jamie?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">slept with Jamie?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">played basketball with Jamie?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">maddened Jamie because she was the type of girl who ignored him in high school?</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 9</h4>
<blockquote>
Will Darren ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">finally ask Linden, "How's my boy Jack?"</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">lose the election by a handful of votes because Belko, Terry, and the Larsens never made it to their polling place?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">throw Gwen under the bus to save Jamie?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">win the mayoral race?</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Question 10</h4>
<blockquote>
At the conclusion of the Season 2 finale, will we find ourselves saying ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">How cool and unexpected!</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Wow, the citizens of Seattle have really gotten screwed!</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Who knew a bulldog had such powerful jaws?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">No one would murder a girl for overhearing <em>that!</em></li>
</ol>
</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com4Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.53570898496886 -81.35195732116699228.534836984968859 -81.353191321166989 28.536580984968861 -81.350723321167tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-52731992413610080732012-06-09T23:01:00.000-04:002012-06-09T23:01:00.147-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 22<h4>Special Message to Det. Holder</h4><blockquote>Come on! We need to get this case solved! A glazed donut? Could you please fuel your partner with something more nutritious! Linden has been conked on the head, held against her will, and drugged. The hospital fed her nothing but low quality carbs. The girl needs some protein, not a 5-minute sugar rush! A ham and egg sandwich would have done the job better.</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Alexi</h4><blockquote>Thank you for removing one viable suspect from the equation! And I'm digging this Larsen guardian angel thing you've got going on!</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Roberta Drays, Security Chief at the Wapi Eagle Casino</h4><blockquote>When will the bosses learn that they cannot count on our loyalty if they're going to crush our fingers in the door? I hope that you have information that will decimate Chief Jackson when the Feds return. Make that bitch pay!</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Chief Jackson</h4><blockquote>Oooo, girl, we just knew you liked it rough!</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Det. Linden</h4><blockquote>Look, I understand wanting to show off the city hall key card you scored to the elevator camera. But you lose the element of surprise when you flash what you found to the enemy. Now they have the opportunity to hide and/or fabricate other evidence before you return. Stop with the playground bravado and let's get this case solved!</blockquote><h4>What I'd Like to See Happen</h4><blockquote>If <em>The Killing</em> was just for me, I'd like to see three things happen:<br />
<br />
<strong>Number One:</strong> I'd like the Larsens to see a glimmer of the happiness we saw in the very first episode of Season 1, before they learned that Rosie was even missing. On the one hand, the removal of Janek Kovarsky—and whatever debt he felt Stan still owed—gives me hope. But that "Bulldog" ended with Mitch sitting in what seemed like severe depression in the darkened kitchen, her "adventure"—as far as the audience knows—having resolved <em>nothing</em>, does not bode well. Still, if <em>The Killing</em> was just for me, I'd have the writers fix it my way.<br />
<br />
<strong>Number Two:</strong> I want Darren to win the election. With less than 24 hours before the polls open and his two campaign managers now under suspicion, I'm not sure how that will happen. And even if it did, Republicans would be organizing a recall vote the next day if a suicidal victor with a murderer on staff won the office. Even so, I want Darren to win, although real life would give the victory to Mayor Adams.<br />
<br />
<strong>Number Three:</strong> I'd love to see Linden in a position where she has the time to select a sandwich made with turkey breast on whole wheat over the "surprise" Holder has in the take-out bag, the sense to return to Nicorette instead of a cigarette, and the option of a real bed over the front seat of her squad car.</blockquote><h4>Gwen vs. Jamie</h4><blockquote>First, we're running out of time for any more false leads. Plus, Veena Sud has <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpwrmaHHhTA" target="_blank">practically announced</a> that the murderer is either Gwen or Jamie. [Thanks for ruining yet another surprise, Ms. Sud!] I don't think Gwen ever really got her bad girl on until this episode when she blackmails her father, so I don't see her capable of drowning a teenaged girl three weeks earlier. My money is still on Jamie "Win at Any Cost" Wright.</blockquote><h4>Word Count</h4><blockquote>The number of words Mitch has spoken this season:<br />
<br />
"Reflections" = 0 words<br />
"My Lucky Day" = 0 words<br />
"Numb" = 22 words<br />
"Ogi Jun" = 0 words<br />
"Ghosts of the Past" = 108 words<br />
"Opening" = 137 words<br />
"Keylela" = 0 words<br />
"Off the Reservation" = 0 words<br />
"Sayonara, Hiawatha" = 233 words<br />
"72 Hours" = 0 words<br />
"Bulldog" = 0 words [An appearance, but, alas, not even a "Stan, I ..."]<br />
<br />
Grand total = 500 words</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535746686931368 -81.352086067199728.535310686931368 -81.352703067199712 28.536182686931369 -81.3514690671997tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-60456936583671985182012-06-02T23:01:00.000-04:002012-06-02T23:01:00.251-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 21<h4>
Never Loses Suction</h4>
<blockquote>
If I had to create an analogy for Det. Linden, I would definitely equate her with a vacuum cleaner. That girl can <em>suck</em> us in to her analyses of situations. Right now, we all believe that Rosie was planning to run away the night she died, her stop at the casino one long last look at the Seattle skyline.<br />
<br />
Hmmm. Rosie had a school book bag with a couple pieces of clothing. Compare that to the duffel bag of laundry that Little Red Riding Pants, a real runaway, carried. Rosie had a clunky Super 8 camera with her. Really, who runs away with that kind of equipment? She had her casino wages to purchase something more convenient if she really wanted to record her adventure. And now Stan thinks her late-night visit to Bennet was to say goodbye? Because high school teachers just let young, naive, unconfident teenaged girls hit the road without trying to stop them?<br />
<br />
No, I now think Linden—and Stan and Mitch—have been sucked into another misinformed analysis of Rosie's behavior. Rosie had what, enough clothes for a sleepover? She had, we think, a friendship with Mary, a reservation inhabitant. Did Mary confess everything she knew in that barbershop interrogation with Linden? Were Rosie and Mary spending the weekend together, playing investigative reporter in a situation that was way over their heads?<br />
<br />
And do you really kill someone who catches you disturbing an ancient Native American graveyard? Would Rosie have understood the significance of exhuming some bones? Would anyone have needed to do more than take the camera and smash it? It's not as if she could 4G footage up to YouTube before they got the device out of her hands! Linden has just successfully trapped us in her Dysonality again.</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Det. Linden</h4>
<blockquote>
Wow. Really, your fiancé Rick Felder is a shrink, someone with an understanding of the fragility of the human spirit? And he let you, despite what he knew about your past mental condition, keep Jack instead of taking responsibility as an impending step-dad and getting your son settled in Sonoma while you finished work on this case? You are better off without him!</blockquote>
<h4>
What Got Rosie Larsen Killed</h4>
<blockquote>
Let's say that Rosie did do, see, or overhear something on the tenth floor that got her killed. Did she ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">End her lesbian tryst with the jealous Mary—who <em>is</em>, believe it or not, on the <a href="http://suspecttracker.amctv.com/" target="_blank">suspect tracker</a>—to date Alexi exclusively?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Catch Chief Jackson French kissing Security Chief Roberta Drays?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">See Chief Jackson, in dominatrix black leather, whipping the naked backside of Mayor Adams, handcuffed to a load-bearing strut?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Record the autopsy of a Sasquatch shot in the woods?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Overhear Chief Jackson ask Mayor Adams to dress as a Sasquatch for their next S&M session?</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
The Last Misdirect</h4>
<blockquote>
The only thing that can lift Darren's campaign out of its 7-point deficit is news that Mayor Adams did something both illegal and really sleazy. But I don't really think anyone from the casino or the mayor's office killed Rosie. Chief Jackson certainly wouldn't chase Rosie; she has a whole loyal gang to do that kind of work for her. And even if she did send her security chief after the girl, Roberta would have buried the body deep in the woods, not have gone to the trouble of stealing a campaign car from the Richmond headquarters and sinking it in a pond. Chief Jackson was trying to negotiate with Darren just an episode ago. If she considered our councilman potentially useful, she wouldn't frame him for Rosie's death. Plus, political correctness dictates that Hollywood not contribute to the old stereotype that "Injuns" are out to harm white folk.<br />
<br />
Mayor Adams is too old to chase down Rosie, and his campaign director, Benjamin Abani, who does look fit enough, is also the wrong race. Rosie's killer will be a white guy on the <a href="http://suspecttracker.amctv.com/" target="_blank">suspect tracker</a>.<br />
<br />
Sure, Chief Jackson and the mayor might be out to screw the citizens of Seattle for their own benefit, but in TV-logic, I just don't see them killing that girl.</blockquote>
<h4>
Mitch's Fate</h4>
<blockquote>
So Stan alludes to Terry that something was wrong at home even before Rosie's death. I'm not sure this information fits that lovely scene in the very first episode of Season 1 when Stan arrives to fix the broken dishwasher. Can a couple share the kind of humor and warmth we saw in our introduction to the Larsens if the wife is depressed, close to a mental break, or miserable with how her life is turning out? I think such a woman would have behaved quite differently to a flooded kitchen, certainly not inviting Stan to a little afternoon delight on the wet floor. Although Mitch's adventure might still provide an important insight that helps solve Rosie's murder, my hope is waning that anything good will come from her storyline. So I'm wondering if our last look at Mitch this season will have her ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Arriving home with a takeout bag from KFC</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Identifying Little Red Riding Pants in a police line up</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Standing in a California field in a swarm of migrating monarch butterflies</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Intentionally driving her car off a bridge or embankment into the water below—while Nirvana's "Come on Death" plays from the radio</li>
</ol>
</blockquote><h4>
Word Count</h4>
<blockquote>
The number of words Mitch has spoken this season:<br />
<br />
"Reflections" = 0 words<br />
"My Lucky Day" = 0 words<br />
"Numb" = 22 words<br />
"Ogi Jun" = 0 words<br />
"Ghosts of the Past" = 108 words<br />
"Opening" = 137 words<br />
"Keylela" = 0 words<br />
"Off the Reservation" = 0 words<br />
"Sayonara, Hiawatha" = 233 words<br />
"72 Hours" = 0 words
<br />
Grand total = 500 words</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535892781908629 -81.35203778743743928.535674781908629 -81.352346287437442 28.536110781908629 -81.351729287437436tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-48086376248285564472012-05-26T23:01:00.000-04:002012-05-29T13:54:03.006-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 20I love the characters of AMC's <em>The Killing</em>. I love the actors who have brought them all to life. But for almost all of Season 2, in every storyline except for Stan and the boys, I find myself asking "WTF?" or rolling my eyes and saying, "That is <em>not</em> plausible!" or, worse yet [as I am a terrible fiction writer], rewriting scenes in my head to improve them. I do not feel swept into the story this season; I dread rather than anticipate my obligation on Sunday evenings.<br />
<h4>
WTF?</h4>
<blockquote>
Gil, a cop with shady things to hide, would not need or choose to use a detachable navigation system that recorded his every move in a city that he should know, as a result of his profession, like the back of his hand. Please. Linden should have pocketed that casino key during a moment of distraction while Lt. Carlson was suspending her at the police station. A demonstration of the shoplifting skills that she would have had the time and motivation to perfect as a runaway teenager would have made more sense. Then we wouldn't have had to listen to Holder's contrived oh-wait-I-know-this-restaurant-oh-wait-there's-a-storage-facility-in-back recognition of the location.</blockquote>
<h4>
That Is Not Plausible!</h4>
<blockquote>
Rosie was planning to drop out of school and run away? Rosie was taking secret 4-hour bus trips to see her biological father? Rosie hadn't been communicating with her parents for months? Who is this girl? I hate that the writers are asking us to forget everything that we know about Rosie and her family. Remember, Rosie was too shy to <em>speak</em> to her teacher, resorting to a penpal relationship with Bennet, too unsure to have sex with her boyfriend. But now we are to believe that she is Ms. Adventure ready to leave loving parents, clean clothes, clean sheets, a clean bathroom, to see the world with casino wages that will get stolen after a day or two on the road?<br />
<br />
Sure, like we hear about that happening all the time—every day it's another story about a 17 year old who has left a stable home, SAT preparation, and afternoon bike rides with little brothers! And please, what teenager would lug around a heavy Super 8 camera for the adventure? You don't think Alexi with his illegal connections wouldn't have gotten her a good deal on a smaller, lighter, more convenient way to capture the trip, something that would have allowed her to upload right to a Facebook, Flickr, or Blogger account? [Really, Alexi, what kind of a boyfriend were you, making that poor girl go to a drugstore to have film <em>developed</em>?]</blockquote>
<h4>
Rewrite</h4>
<blockquote>
So in the middle of the day, Mitch goes to see David Ranier, Rosie's biological father and Mitch's initiator into Seattle grunge. We know it's the work week because Tommy was stomping baby birds to death in the school yard. Conveniently, though, David is home and ready to confess that when a strange 17 year old arrives on his doorstep, he advises her that before she disappears, she should at least let people know that she's running away. Oh, please. What is he, a pot dealer generating income from a basement grow house? Come on! Real adults just don't advise strange teenagers to behave like that. And dumb-ass adults who would recommend that Rosie run away don't live in perfect houses in family neighborhoods.<br />
<br />
This scene would have been so much more powerful if David's wife was glaring from the sidelines, if David's dark-haired daughter came up to Mitch with dolls and announced, "Rosie and I played with these!" or if the wife had gotten Mitch alone for a minute to explain that she had tried to convince her husband to call the Larsens and tell them Rosie's plans. This scene would have been so much more powerful if Mitch had whispered fiercely, "You could have told her to finish her college applications instead!" Because, you know, David probably paid for that fine house with the type of gainful employment that requires a college degree.</blockquote>
<h4>
My Guess</h4>
<blockquote>
So I have finished "cheating" and have seen all of <em>Forbrydelsen</em>. And as I've said, it's like seeing a copy of the test before the exam. You know what the questions will be, but you still have to figure out the right answers.<br />
<br />
At this point, I don't really care who killed Rosie. Last season, she seemed like a real person, and I enjoyed learning bits and pieces about her life as the investigation unfolded. I thought she was a cool kid and wanted justice for her. This season, she is just a pawn the writers are pushing around, trying to get us to buy into whatever contrived ending they have fabricated. So since I don't care any longer, let me take a guess.<br />
<br />
Nanna Birk Larsen, Rosie's equivalent, died at the hands of someone who, as a result of changes the writers have made, cannot be the killer in the US version of the story. That's okay because the revelation of the Danish killer was not satisfying. He had to make a long speech in the last episode explaining what happened and why he did it. I was yelling, "That's not motivated!" at the TV screen the entire time.<br />
<br />
I assume that we won't be satisfied with Rosie's killer either. I assume that he, too, will have to make an unsatisfying speech to explain his behavior. If <em>The Killing</em> uses <em>Forbrydelsen</em> as inspiration for the revelation, then Jamie is the killer. What, you say, sweet Jamie who doesn't even touch alcohol? He couldn't possibly be the killer! Well, that's exactly how I felt about the murderer at the end of <em>Forbrydelsen</em>. No way! <em>He</em> [I'm trying not to ruin it if you haven't seen it] couldn't have sat at the Birk Larsens' dining table just a few minutes ago without a single guilty twitch if he had been the one to rape, beat, and drown Nanna [Nanna is <em>savaged</em> in <em>Forbrydelsen</em>].<br />
<br />
So back to Jamie, remember that he plays to <em>win</em>.<br />
<br />
My guess is that something like this happened: Jamie has known about and covered for Darren's sexual dalliances the ten years that they've worked together. Jamie hears—maybe from Benjamin Abani, his counterpart in the mayor's office [I never really understood their fight at the gym]—that Darren has accidentally killed a young woman during sex. Jamie arrives to find a "dead" Rosie. Jamie assumes that Darren did in fact kill her and, wanting to cover for his boss, disposes of the "body," not realizing that Rosie is in fact alive. Because Jamie pushes the car into the water, he is technically her killer—although I assume that someone from this tiresome casino storyline chased her through the woods, knocked her unconscious, and tied her up.<br />
<br />
I'm picking Jamie because Morten Weber, his counterpart in <em>Forbrydelsen</em>, did believe that Troels Hartman, the idealistic Danish politician, had killed Nanna and then covered for his boss, jeopardizing the investigation. What would be a really cool ending is if Jamie isn't arrested [Morten, as a precedent, never faces consequences]. Darren and the audience discover that Jamie is the killer but someone else pays, maybe someone who looks guilty but dies before we know for sure. Darren has to live with the fact that Jamie thought he was capable of killing but still wanted to see him elected mayor.<br />
<br />
If I'm wrong, then I'm looking forward to seeing if my ending isn't better than what the writers have dreamt up. [I don't currently have a lot of faith in the writers.]</blockquote>
<h4>
Word Count</h4>
<blockquote>
The number of words Mitch has spoken this season:<br />
<br />
"Reflections" = 0 words<br />
"My Lucky Day" = 0 words<br />
"Numb" = 22 words<br />
"Ogi Jun" = 0 words<br />
"Ghosts of the Past" = 108 words<br />
"Opening" = 137 words<br />
"Keylela" = 0 words<br />
"Off the Reservation" = 0 words<br />
"Sayonara, Hiawatha" = 233 words<br />
<br />
Grand total = 500 words even—Wow, I guess we won't get to see Mitch again until the season finale since she nearly doubled her dialog in "Sayonara, Hiawatha."</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com8Lake Como Cir, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535803239849827 -81.35204315185546928.535367239849826 -81.352660151855474 28.536239239849827 -81.351426151855463tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-15644312339319643652012-05-19T23:01:00.000-04:002012-05-19T23:01:00.093-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 19<h4>
The Truth Is Out There</h4>
<blockquote>
Why is it that every time Linden is screaming for her partner, I hear "Mulder," not "Holder"? It must be all of those flashlights bouncing around in dark, wet woods. Will we discover the frozen remains of an extraterrestrial on the tenth floor of the casino hotel? Are NASA engineers dismantling a UFO behind the locked door? Did the case that caused Linden's first mental break end with a young child abducted by intergalactic visitors while Linden watched helplessly, her arm shielding her eyes from the faster-than-light propulsion system on the space craft?</blockquote>
<h4>
Have It Your Way</h4>
<blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNJDDwjRR29aTskFVCshsTszytgwxxGtEIGXQvlT4-FpB0VlBPcretXvEtO-JHbPR1hZPuxQJWXTAQ_4awdj130zGRbL1eaLHRD7v_yAtHpMSQakIsZMEnIdTsD56L6FDgV2K4Vc2KwjI/s1600/sarah_linden01.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Mireille Enos as Sarah Linden and Q'orianka Kilchner as Mary" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNJDDwjRR29aTskFVCshsTszytgwxxGtEIGXQvlT4-FpB0VlBPcretXvEtO-JHbPR1hZPuxQJWXTAQ_4awdj130zGRbL1eaLHRD7v_yAtHpMSQakIsZMEnIdTsD56L6FDgV2K4Vc2KwjI/s200/sarah_linden01.jpeg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>
Why would Rosie scrub toilets with skin-blistering chemicals? If she wanted low paying service work, why bother with the long ferry commute? I'm certain a McDonald's or Burger King was within biking distance of home!<br />
<br />
And why would Rosie bother depositing her under-the-table cash wages into a bank account? Interest rates are currently so low, saving isn't worth the trouble—unless Tommy and Denny were little thieves pilfering her cash to buy candy and video games. She should have just kept the money in the sock drawer in her bedroom.<br />
<br />
Was Rosie <em>really</em> a maid/waitress working for Chief Jackson? Or should we doubt even that piece of information about our murder victim? All the chair twirling and those evasive eyes don't make Mary a believable witness!</blockquote>
<h4>
Business Sense</h4>
<blockquote>
Why would Stan, someone who must have spent his entire working life dealing with people who tried to get more work out of the moving company than the initial estimate allowed, not know that $12K of reward money would lure out the crackpots and crazies?<br />
<br />
Although the scene with a woman ready to break out a crystal ball to contact dead Rosie in the spirit world was heartbreaking, Stan's willingness to entertain this type of person seemed more a plot device than real character development. The writers just needed motivation for him to ignore the blinking light on the answering machine once he got home. So who left the message, Terry or Mitch?</blockquote>
<h4>
Super Powers</h4>
<blockquote>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiApG857BChpI9LZxp3jx2VF82NygwYnI_OIDalUE1wajwQm321vTO6BGCNsLKfWsH6EkHoUtpGiRX1E1VvVQh7ApO2RI2qygq1cT-KNLcQekdJcFzkfgNOQh5kcVQmKu7qaYE89NfCIN4/s1600/stephen_holder01.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiApG857BChpI9LZxp3jx2VF82NygwYnI_OIDalUE1wajwQm321vTO6BGCNsLKfWsH6EkHoUtpGiRX1E1VvVQh7ApO2RI2qygq1cT-KNLcQekdJcFzkfgNOQh5kcVQmKu7qaYE89NfCIN4/s200/stephen_holder01.jpeg" title="Joel Kinnaman as Stephen Holder" width="200" /></a></div>
How does Holder, beaten so badly that he can't save himself from death from exposure, manage to get to the airport where Linden is putting Jack on a plane to Chicago? At the hospital, I didn't even see a saline drip for rehydration in his arm!</blockquote>
<h4>
You Can Fix Anything with a Pregnancy</h4>
<blockquote>
When Gwen said, "I'm late [long pause] for a meeting at the ad agency ...," was she about to admit that she's pregnant with Darren's baby!?!</blockquote>
<h4>
Word Count</h4>
<blockquote>
The number of words Mitch has spoken this season:<br />
<br />
"Reflections" = 0 words<br />
"My Lucky Day" = 0 words<br />
"Numb" = 22 words<br />
"Ogi Jun" = 0 words<br />
"Ghosts of the Past" = 108 words<br />
"Opening" = 137 words<br />
"Keylela" = 0 words<br />
"Off the Reservation" = 0 words<br />
<br />
Grand total = 267 words—If words were pennies, I made more money in savings account interest this month than we heard dialog from Mitch. We do have a new picture for tomorrow's episode, so I guess I'll be counting words for next week's post. It looks as though Mitch hasn't yet had to pawn her wedding ring for gas and snack money!<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjG8iMTNtSsVhwEzyNcsq93NF1V0izGosrlNnsjxXmojAP9azMlKCxW0MNHJHn8qS-OpgarQeUft1fypcgfiMhpLwbo54NGotqcTxw1D575R8Hj7w08tKuGLUKzsMjH8J6dkqJ22PxNjzA/s1600/mitch_larsen03.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Michelle Forbes as Mitch Larsen" border="0" height="281" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjG8iMTNtSsVhwEzyNcsq93NF1V0izGosrlNnsjxXmojAP9azMlKCxW0MNHJHn8qS-OpgarQeUft1fypcgfiMhpLwbo54NGotqcTxw1D575R8Hj7w08tKuGLUKzsMjH8J6dkqJ22PxNjzA/s400/mitch_larsen03.jpeg" title="" width="400" /></a></div>
</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535746686931368 -81.352086067199728.534003186931368 -81.3545535671997 28.537490186931368 -81.349618567199713tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-65881708043760141682012-05-12T23:01:00.000-04:002012-05-19T22:17:58.442-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 18<h4>
Didn't You Expect ...</h4>
<blockquote>
When Sterling returned Rosie's locker contents to Stan, didn't you expect them both to look up to find Mitch standing in the doorway, tears in her eyes?<br />
<br />
And when Gwen and Jamie offer a reduction of Stan's impending prison sentence in return for his reading a statement exonerating Richmond, didn't you expect all three of them to look up to find Mitch standing in the doorway, her face flashing with anger?<br />
<br />
And then when Stan learns of Terry's involvement in Beau Soleil and throws her out of the house, didn't you expect to find that Mitch had heard the whole confession, magnifying the horror of Terry's behavior?<br />
<br />
Or even when Richmond himself visits Stan, didn't you expect to see Mitch's fingers curl around the handlebars of the wheelchair as she leaned down to offer a push inside? [Well, no, even I didn't expect <em>that</em>, but it would have been nice if Mitch had made the appearance.]<br />
<br />
But really, when Stan goes off script at the press conference, didn't you expect to transition to a television which, as the camera pulled back, revealed Mitch listening to her husband getting all passionate about justice for his dead daughter? That time, I really <em>did</em> expect to see her.</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Jack</h4>
<blockquote>
Look, if you're going to engineer the escape from child protective services, then you should be high-fiving its success with your mother, not curling up in a fetal position and pouting in the passenger seat as the two of you speed away.</blockquote>
<h4>
I Got a Bad Feeling</h4>
<blockquote>
I am worried about Holder surviving the beating at the casino. You see, despite my promise to myself, I am watching <em>Forbrydelsen</em> before <em>The Killing</em> has officially ended. It's like getting the test questions in advance of an exam. All I can say is that I was so worried about Mitch that I just had to see if a similar meltdown had happened to her Danish counterpart, Pernille. [If you're worried too, I'll let you know that like Mitch, Pernille beds a businessman that she picks up at a hotel, and Theis, the Stan character, gets robbed by some young thugs as he wanders Copenhagen in a drunken stupor. So Mitch's troubling behavior is not straying <em>too</em> far from the original story.]<br />
<br />
Jan Meyer, Stephen Holder's original incarnation, is still alive [and finally likable] by episode 15 [where I currently am], but having visited the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0826760/" target="_blank">Forbrydelsen IMDB page</a>, I notice that Meyer appears in only 19 of the 20 episodes and is not part of the second season. Yikes. I hope they're both okay. I love Holder, and I'm starting to develop some fondness for Meyer. Having to deal with the deaths of both this coming week would be hard.</blockquote>
<h4>
Word Count</h4>
<blockquote>
The number of words Mitch has spoken this season:<br />
<br />
"Reflections" = 0 words<br />
"My Lucky Day" = 0 words<br />
"Numb" = 22 words<br />
"Ogi Jun" = 0 words<br />
"Ghosts of the Past" = 108 words<br />
"Opening" = 137 words<br />
"Keylela" = 0 words<br />
<br />
Grand total = 267 words—If words were dollars, we'd be stalled worse than Max and Caroline trying to save enough money to launch their cupcake business!</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-35787312905732743592012-05-05T23:01:00.000-04:002012-05-19T22:19:41.181-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 17<h4>
Oh, Writers!</h4>
<blockquote>
Terry's breakup with Michael Ames was <em>lame</em>. So was her explanation of their deep and meaningful "connection" when Linden and Holder interviewed her yet again. Plus, for us to buy Jasper's confrontation with his father, we first needed a scene showing what Mrs. Ames or Rosie meant to this self-absorbed young man. Otherwise, Jasper doesn't really have a reason to leave his champagne-soaked skip day to track down Dad, a man not afraid to use his fists.<br />
<br />
But I do want to compliment you for a couple of zingers that made this episode bearable. I loved when Holder announces, "Yo, you're, like, becoming <em>A Beautiful Mind</em> with that board, Linden," and when Gwen tells Darren, "Well, call me if [Jamie] tries to breastfeed you."</blockquote>
<h4>
Thanks, Jasper!</h4>
<blockquote>
Despite their interview with you, I think the cops still believe that Rosie was a prostitute—or at least sleeping with someone too old and too powerful for her. Oh, well. They'll come around eventually. I do want to thank you, though, for inspiring my new favorite catchphrase, <em>virgin dork</em>, a descriptor for unsophisticated teenage bling. You know, pink, rhinestones, butterflies. "Oh, I can't wear that shirt. The color is too virgin dork" or "Oh, that print won't work with your décor! It's virgin dork!" I have a feeling I'll be using the expression all summer.</blockquote>
<h4>
Hey, Linden!</h4>
<blockquote>
When you asked Stan if he had had any problems with Rosie the months before her murder, and he answered, "Me and Rosie were always good," your next question should have been, "What kind of problems was she having with Mitch?" Come on, let's get this thing solved! Even I am losing patience!<br />
<br />
And another thing, I assume that even cheap motels have a cleaning staff, so before you get all spooked about a picture on the refrigerator, consider for just a moment that housekeeping might have innocently stuck it on the freezer door, thinking that you wouldn't want your kid's artwork lost under the bed or ruined by a bucket of melting ice. The poor maid wouldn't have known the significance of that crayon drawing!<br />
<br />
You know, I was so disappointed in the contents of Mitch's box, that I don't really care what's in your personnel file. But I'll bet we get a whole episode about your past meltdown before this season is over!</blockquote>
<h4>
Yo, Mitch!</h4>
<blockquote>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgACoMy9FfrrX9N2NffiXJzZ8ai-mLub-zLDTpDDMp6luphO5yNxsb1nTAknMW7OcdPgy0nOrINF1LxGhkABdaxAt3p-NI08_wEyz3CpUGNEJ4wRdkyVlTuFcc18ZN46WCPcwY_LNUzfkw/s1600/redridingpants_mitchlarsen.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Chelsea Ricketts as Tina [Little Red Riding Pants] and Michelle Forbes as Mitch Larsen on The Killing" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgACoMy9FfrrX9N2NffiXJzZ8ai-mLub-zLDTpDDMp6luphO5yNxsb1nTAknMW7OcdPgy0nOrINF1LxGhkABdaxAt3p-NI08_wEyz3CpUGNEJ4wRdkyVlTuFcc18ZN46WCPcwY_LNUzfkw/s200/redridingpants_mitchlarsen.jpeg" title="" width="200" /></a>Rosie was a good kid. She was smart. She had good priorities for a teenager. She was an artist who could see things differently. If she had lived, her palette would have expanded beyond pink. You're not going to find answers or forgiveness from Little Red Riding Pants, who obviously did not grow up in the relatively sane and stable Larsen home and probably has good reason—an abusive step-father or an alcoholic mother—not to call home.<br />
<br />
A girl who threatens teachers with lies about sexual harassment, who believes one poorly executed pirouette qualifies her for the Cincinnati ballet, and who robs you blind is severely damaged. She is <em>not</em> your Rosie!<br />
<br />
I'm sorry that your youth as an environmental activist metamorphosed into wife and mother, but your letter to Rosie's father indicates that you made a conscious decision to follow the homemaker path. So call Stan. He can settle the motel bill and gas up the station wagon. Get on home. We need that big confrontation with Terry that has been brewing since last season.</blockquote>
<h4>
Word Count</h4>
<blockquote>
How many words of dialog has Mitch spoken in Season 2?
<br />
<br />
"Reflections" = 0 words<br />
"My Lucky Day" = 0 words<br />
"Numb" = 22 words<br />
"Ogi Jun" = 0 words<br />
"Ghosts of the Past" = 108 words<br />
"Opening" = 137 words<br />
<br />
Grand total = 267 words, not enough for even a freshman composition!</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535822090815902 -81.35212898254394528.5288470908159 -81.361999482543951 28.542797090815903 -81.34225848254394tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-60258341479730851922012-04-28T23:01:00.000-04:002012-04-28T23:01:00.665-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 16<h4>
The Kiss</h4>
<blockquote>
What do we know about Stan? He's a doer, not a talker. Time and time again, we've watched him act without hesitation or concern for the consequences. Need information about Rosie's whereabouts? Grab her ex-boyfriend by the throat. Want to get the family on track? Pack up your dead daughter's room and erase her existence from the house. Cops not getting you justice quickly enough? Kidnap the suspect they're considering and bash out his brains. That Stan went seeking intimacy with the resident adult female fits the instinctual impulses that compel him.<br />
<br />
I am not judging you, Papa Bear. If life and its complications had gotten as rough on <em>Roseanne</em>, Dan Conner might have looked for comfort in Jackie's arms. [Ew.]<br />
<br />
I do wish AMC would plug the leaks about what's to come. I didn't like learning that Rosie's murder would be solved at the end of the second season. And I don't like knowing, even before the next episode airs, that the <a href="http://www.craveonline.com/tv/interviews/187359-theres-still-secrets-jamie-anne-allman-on-the-killing" target="_blank">kiss is as far as the Stan-Terry connection goes</a>.</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Mitch</h4>
<blockquote>
I understood a road trip to, as my father puts it, "blow the cobwebs out." But you're not traveling, are you? You're just parked at that motel. Are you waiting for someone?<br />
<br />
Now let's talk about Little Red Riding Pants. On the one hand, you were creeping me out stuffing her with all that sugar. I kept flashing to the blind witch in the woods fattening up lost children before she roasts them in the oven. Your easy fictions about your family made me question where your mind is.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, though, you know better than to give a desperate runaway with a big, impulsive boyfriend the number of your room at a poorly maintained motel. Yeah, make it easy for the two of them to rob you! And this is TV, so you won't come back to a room in disarray. Oh, no. We'll have to watch Little Red Riding Pants first trick you into opening the door and then her boyfriend knock you to the carpet, demanding to know where the money is. Should such violence occur, I hope that they shake out that damn box you brought with you so that we finally learn what's inside.</blockquote>
<h4>
The Box, Again</h4>
<blockquote>
What's inside Mitch's mysterious box?
<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Terry's love letters to Stan</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">X's love letters to Mitch [X = Rosie's biological father]</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Art supplies</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Dead, crispy monarch butterflies</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">A gun</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Alexi</h4>
<blockquote>
What kind of a boyfriend are you? You can track Stan like a hunter after a bear, but you didn't bother to sneak onto the ferry to discover what Rosie was doing? Shame on you!</blockquote>
<h4>
I'll Have the Fish, Please</h4>
<blockquote>
I think I preferred last season's string of red herrings to Season 2's endless look at how parents mess up their children. I have sympathy for Det. Linden and Alexi because of their experiences in child protective services. That Jasper has to contend with an abusive father makes me dislike him a little less.<br />
<br />
But I don't understand Jack's father being upset with his son's care. Det. Linden has not been ignoring Jack for the 14 months that <em>The Killing</em> has existed, just the 2 ½ weeks of <em>Killing</em> time, and for much of that, Jack was under Regi's care. I am sorry that Terry doesn't get the same kind of approval from her parents that Mitch does, but Terry is an adult, and her parents aren't to blame for her own bad choices.<br />
<br />
And we can't forget <a href="http://www.amctv.com/shows/the-killing/rosies-room" target="_blank">Rosie's bedroom</a>. A teenager truly unhappy with her family would have decorated the walls with celebrities who offered fantasy escapes from her horrible existence. But Rosie chose pictures of family and friends, indicating that she had a good home life. So why would Rosie have a problem with Stan not being her <em>biological</em> father? And why would her good mother abandon the still <em>living</em> children so callously? The explanations had better be worth it!</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535482772910566 -81.3520002365112328.531995272910567 -81.356935736511232 28.538970272910564 -81.347064736511228tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-13462321366471756932012-04-21T23:01:00.000-04:002012-04-21T23:01:00.163-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 15<h4>
Shaking the Box</h4>
<blockquote>
Seldom do I play with the online extras for my favorite TV shows. A series should stand on its own, and I should get everything I need from the actual episodes. If in <em>The Killing</em>, for example, a real clue about Rosie's murder existed exclusively in the <a href="http://www.amctv.com/shows/the-killing/rosies-room" target="_blank">interactive version of her bedroom</a>, I'd feel cheated as a viewer of the show.<br />
<br />
But that box that Mitch has in "Numb" is so enticing that I finally visited the bedroom to see if I could spot it among Rosie's possessions. This <a href="http://www.amctv.com/shows/the-killing/rosies-room" target="_blank">interactive feature</a> appears to capture the bedroom that existed before the family realized Rosie was dead. Bennet's letter is still hidden in the globe; a worried message from Sterling is still on the phone.<br />
<br />
I can't find the box anywhere—although Rosie wasn't the neatest teenager, and it could lie beneath the heap of clothes on the floor, under the bed, or in one of the drawers that, despite my insistent clicking, won't open.<br />
<br />
The contents must be important and not necessarily Rosie's. All we can do is wait and wait until "Christmas" arrives and pray that, once the lid comes off, the box doesn't contain yet another bulky sweater so many of the female cast seem to favor.</blockquote>
<h4>
Taking Inventory</h4>
<blockquote>
How many situations have rocked Stan and the boys' world since Mitch left? Well, if Mitch is avoiding TV news, she doesn't know that her husband's best friend tried to assassinate Councilman Richmond and then was himself gunned down. She missed the delivery of Rosie's bloody book bag. She's unaware that her surviving children are freaking out and, despite his impressive size and baseball bat, Stan himself is fearful enough to arrange mob protection with its considerable debt to Kovarsky. And can't you imagine the earful that Detectives Linden and Holder would get if Mitch knew that they suspected her daughter of prostitution!<br />
<br />
With all of this additional stress in Stan's life, you would think that he would need his helpmate, but Stan seems unconcerned with Mitch's absence and sympathetic to her need to vanish. Obviously, he knows something about his wife that we don't. Now what could that be?</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Gwen</h4>
<blockquote>
Okay, you surprised me and made your flight to DC. Now get back to Seattle, girlfriend! As your phone call to Jamie revealed, you are so obviously not over Darren.<br />
<br />
If last season we wallowed in the Larsens' grief, then this season we're immersed in your boyfriend's paralysis. People, in general, avert their eyes when they spot folks in wheelchairs because that complete loss of mobility and sensation is so horrifying. We think to ourselves, "No, please, not <em>that</em> for me. Please."<br />
<br />
It's <em>hard</em> wanting to avert my eyes through one third of an episode every Sunday evening, so we need that boy back on the campaign trail. We need a feel-good moment! Mayor Adams needs to pay for making Darren look guilty for Rosie's death and inspiring Belko's meltdown. You can help. Book a seat back to Seattle now!</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Det. Linden</h4>
<blockquote>
You have now spent enough time on this case to realize that the murderer won't be a typical suspect. As you and Holder go chasing after Alexi Giffords, please realize that he is just a boy who got his heart stomped by a pretty young thing, not someone who has the brains or power to pull together the three threads of <em>The Killing</em>. The pencil slashes on Rosie's portrait are not Alexi anticipating revenge against Stan for his father's death; no, those slashes are just a young man trying to erase his feelings for the woman who wouldn't reciprocate.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguOcZ40o6IGQIgPDAh22V0G3pU55mO9dX0wX-ZRzZE7qmsKemFDFyiDk5aHk3GgLMCzGv3Q70BL7X3W5zQ8CcNT5fRatvflT67l5qHJ4dxa9M9oKJHeGdbIjrSoKcHdodvo_LVVjpajLE/s1600/stanlarsen01.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguOcZ40o6IGQIgPDAh22V0G3pU55mO9dX0wX-ZRzZE7qmsKemFDFyiDk5aHk3GgLMCzGv3Q70BL7X3W5zQ8CcNT5fRatvflT67l5qHJ4dxa9M9oKJHeGdbIjrSoKcHdodvo_LVVjpajLE/s200/stanlarsen01.jpeg" width="200" /></a></div>
I've avoided calling you incompetent because I understand that the audience has more information than you do since we get insight into the other characters' lives when you're not present. But lately I'm beginning to worry that all the wrong trees you've barked up, all the blind alleys you've gone down will so destroy the Larsen family that Stan will end up jailed [scenes keep foreshadowing him caged], Terry dead, Mitch who-knows-where, and the Tommy and Denny in foster care getting initiated into <em>your</em> experiences as a child!<br />
<br />
Rosie was depositing money into her aunt's account. Maybe Terry didn't know that Rosie was the person making those deposits, but she certainly benefitted from the money appearing. Please go question Terry more carefully!</blockquote>
<h4>
Special Message to Jasper Ames</h4>
<blockquote>
Skulk all you want in the background, your face pinched and your brow knitted. We're not biting that the detectives overlooked you as Rosie's real murderer. Your father, on the other hand, has had our attention for quite a while. Do you have something to share that the police should know? You don't strike me as the kind of morally upright young man who would risk losing the perks of his father's wealth to help get justice for Rosie. Surprise us! Spill what you know!</blockquote>
<h4>
Michelle Forbes on Mitch Larsen</h4>
<blockquote>
Need more Mitch than AMC is providing on <em>The Killing</em> this season? Try this very short interview at YouTube:<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/HnQy7QksKx8" width="560"></iframe></blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.53570898496886 -81.35187149047851628.53396548496886 -81.35433899047851 28.53745248496886 -81.349403990478521tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-36843830773566197892012-04-14T23:01:00.000-04:002012-04-14T23:39:01.224-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 14<h4>When Will We Learn?</h4><blockquote>How often has <em>The Killing</em> fooled us because we so willingly embrace stereotypes? Last season, we jumped on Jasper as Rosie's killer because, well, all wealthy young people are sexually depraved. Doesn't everyone remember the Paris Hilton sex tape? Then we jumped on Bennet, the high school English teacher, because, hey, all public school employees are perverts preying on our children. Didn't an LA teacher just get arrested for feeding semen-glazed cookies to his elementary students? Next, we jumped on Councilman Richmond because, you know, all politicians are promiscuous sleazebags who operate above the law. We can just ignore the thousands of elected officials who do their jobs without becoming household names for inappropriate acts. And at the end of the first season, when we overheard Holder thanking the mysterious stranger for the photo, we jumped to the wrong conclusion about our lovable detective because, gosh, all junkies are untrustworthy—that's why we don't want that rehab facility built in <em>our</em> neighborhood.<br />
<br />
But then the writers cleared all these men of the suspicions we harbored. We learned, after that vicious slap from Mr. Ames, that Jasper was himself a victim, not the victimizer. And we discovered that Bennet was operating from high moral [if not legal] principles as he hustled a <em>living</em> girl out of his apartment the night Rosie died. Councilman Richmond might have bought himself a hooker, but he is, we remember, unmarried, and when the news breaks, he won't have to ask a wife to make that stand-by-her-man appearance beside the confessional podium as he apologizes to his constituents for the indiscretion. And Holder, we find out, was just an unsuspecting go-between, not entrenched in the conspiracy to discredit the councilman.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4x0N9QTH0ODLbgKb23Rj87ZK-k3n0NNMsypDvPMPAppLxem48NzO1oA4ccDs63obuz4mCYDNEOLIvwdQJMTMunyK0kY4Q-PhSZ9cMbZD-8tf04kUozqEMws6UIgROd1WS5AD8hoySxew/s1600/mitch02.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Michelle Forbes as Mitch Larsen in The Killing" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg4x0N9QTH0ODLbgKb23Rj87ZK-k3n0NNMsypDvPMPAppLxem48NzO1oA4ccDs63obuz4mCYDNEOLIvwdQJMTMunyK0kY4Q-PhSZ9cMbZD-8tf04kUozqEMws6UIgROd1WS5AD8hoySxew/s200/mitch02.jpeg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>So in this new season, the writers are going after the girls. We are still convinced that Rosie is a prostitute because, c'mon, all teenage girls are sluts. And now we've watched mother Mitch bed a textbook rep to reinforce the idea that apple Rosie hasn't fallen far from the family tree. [Well, we didn't actually <em>watch</em> the sex happen, and we should have learned from previous episodes not to trust what we don't <em>see</em>, but there was the more relaxed drag on the cigarette as she stares out at the motel pool ...]<br />
<br />
Are we going to fall for these stereotypes too? I am absolutely convinced that Rosie was <em>not</em> a prostitute. Did we see her profile getting erased at the end of "Numb"? No. I also don't think that Kovarsky lied to Stan. I do believe that Kovarsky burned down the shoe store and destroyed the evidence of Beau Soleil's existence. You hire the mob for that kind of job! I'm sure that the councilman wasn't the only high-profile member of Seattle society who would have frequented the service but wouldn't want that fact revealed—and would have the money to disappear the business. But I am also sure that Kovarsky shared the truth with Stan and didn't, despite his high ranking this week on the <a href="http://suspecttracker.amctv.com/breakdown.php" target="_blank">Suspect Tracker</a>, kill Rosie.<br /><br />Veena Sud <em>identifies</em> with Rosie! So Ms. Sud is not going to have had our murder victim sneaking off to earn extra cash <em>hooking</em> so that the girl could buy more butterfly stickers! Something else got Rosie in trouble.</blockquote><h4>Off the Path</h4><blockquote>Since this episode began with Mitch's first glance of Little Red Riding Pants hitchhiking on the side of the road [way off the route her mother would have advised], let's take a detour ourselves from some common assumptions.<br />
<br />
We assume that the box Mitch has brought with her is Rosie's, but is it? Rosie liked her possessions pink and emblazoned with butterflies. Could that box belong to Terry instead? Does its travel motif have any connection to the shirt Terry was wearing in "Numb," the one sporting the names of major world cities? Did Mitch discover why Rosie was depositing money into Terry's account?<br />
<br />
Or does the box belong to Mitch herself? Has Rosie's death reawakened a life that Mitch could have had if she hadn't gotten pregnant with Rosie? Does Little Red Riding Pants remind Mitch not of Rosie but of herself at that age?<br />
<br />
And what about that tattoo? We're not getting another pink Grand Canyon T-shirt confusion, are we? Apparently, Ogi Jun is a <em>Killing</em> creation. So how popular is the character in this fictionalized Seattle? Is he <em>the</em> tattoo to have? Is Stan's beefy moving guy [Rosie's type?] just one of many men getting inked with this character?</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Gwen</h4><blockquote>We expect you to board a plane to DC about as much as we expected Linden ever to make her flight to California. You now know that Darren didn't kill Rosie. Maybe he can explain the Beau Soleil account. Give him a chance! You had five pictures in the Season 2 <a href="http://blogs.amctv.com/photo-galleries/the-killing-season-2-cast-gallery/stephen-sarah-terry-tom-stan-denny-mitch-jamie-darren-gwen.php" target="_blank">cast gallery</a>, so we know that we're not going to lose you this soon into the new season!</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Det. Holder</h4><blockquote>Look, your partner is going to need your help to solve this crime. You're a smart guy. We all cheered when you handed off the wrong book bag to the evidence lab. But as you and Linden get closer to the truth, the enemy will want to take you out, and there's no better way than to have you arrested for drug possession. So please throw out the meth you stashed in the car astray! I'm begging you!</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Councilman Richmond</h4><blockquote><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTfTKRfJ_6xdKEVjjn3o9b4H3xicWP6BEEbIm8htReo_vnKsOYlYQeHa17Csa5Ui3cN77XuYqoccEwthOb8TSQncxYalkSIIuHS8QC7-fpxMY5lOWbK0NdtSFgK2L6HAn-MLOZ7msViX8/s1600/richmond01.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Billy Campbell as Councilman Darren Richmond, The Killing" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTfTKRfJ_6xdKEVjjn3o9b4H3xicWP6BEEbIm8htReo_vnKsOYlYQeHa17Csa5Ui3cN77XuYqoccEwthOb8TSQncxYalkSIIuHS8QC7-fpxMY5lOWbK0NdtSFgK2L6HAn-MLOZ7msViX8/s200/richmond01.jpeg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>I just discovered a new photo of you in the <a href="http://blogs.amctv.com/photo-galleries/the-killing-season-2-cast-gallery/stephen-sarah-terry-tom-stan-denny-mitch-jamie-darren-gwen.php" target="_blank">cast gallery</a>. And in this one you're <em>standing!</em> Look, I don't want anyone to remain paralyzed. But I loved the realistic way the writers handled your denial of your condition in "Numb": how a hot nurse handling your penis during the catheter change didn't register, how you "felt" the doctor's touch when he didn't have a hand on you, how you began to accept after sticking yourself with the campaign button pin. All of those scenes did an amazing job communicating the horror of your paralysis. If, however, you miraculously regain feeling, then I'm going to feel betrayed because I don't think that's the reality for most people whose spines get severed. I can't imagine how a real paralyzed viewer will feel by this flight of fantasy. Here's hoping that we get another explanation for why you're <em>upright</em> in the new photo.</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-52969047260501806962012-04-07T23:01:00.000-04:002012-04-15T19:13:45.399-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 13<h4>A Matter of Trust</h4><blockquote><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2Hy4vULm1rBgGRrrKYr2tQDMuNCABUUnL0vGAMm41pb0V13kJIY8aIVTKSv8bUo0tNIksFApCYet6Kcs9nrXRNqBkASgC4cEIPmoUAzCCFUxvLsR5uLgGKFSI0K-te0FI4RFTfbUZlWE/s1600/thekilling.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Mireille Enos as Sarah Linden and Joel Kinnaman as Stephen Holder on The Killing" border="0" height="150" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh2Hy4vULm1rBgGRrrKYr2tQDMuNCABUUnL0vGAMm41pb0V13kJIY8aIVTKSv8bUo0tNIksFApCYet6Kcs9nrXRNqBkASgC4cEIPmoUAzCCFUxvLsR5uLgGKFSI0K-te0FI4RFTfbUZlWE/s200/thekilling.jpg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>Poor Linden. Right now, our obsessed detective distrusts both her lieutenant and her partner. The audience knows that she is mistaken about Holder. So is she wrong about Lieutenant Oakes too? Is he not really part of a conspiracy to hide Rosie's real killer? Can we explain his behavior as Big Daddy concern for Sarah's mental health?<br />
<br />
And if she's wrong to distrust her colleagues in the police department, is she also erring in the confidence she has for Dep. Attorney Niilsen, her friend in the DA's office? Some of us recognize that Niilsen is Sophie Gråbøl, the original Sara Lund of the Danish <em>Forbrydelsen.</em> Have we mistakenly transfered Lund's trustworthiness to Niilsen, throwing ourselves off track yet again?</blockquote><h4>Special Message for Linden</h4><blockquote>Look, girlfriend, if you can lock eyes with a crab fisherman and know in your creepy hoodoo way that he has the explanation for Richmond's wet clothes the night of Rosie's death, then you can also hear the sincerity in Holder's voice and realize he's your ally, not your enemy. <br />
<br />
And when the photo of the tattooed arm spills out onto your motel bed, you might want to note that son Jack is reading Japanese manga and can identify the character for you!</blockquote><h4>Really?</h4><blockquote><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ9abW0G2qYyk4C_2mLNwVF5gSkp7tUqMbyaejly76h08gStQhs1O1GAKno2HUFfaeQM6LkVJ9U5zofXAeKOSqk14Maop3KGb1AExYVTql3g0u922kSz-hsdH59_BnopvsxOSTT7zcJpA/s1600/linden+_niilsen.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Mireille Enos as Sarah Linden and Sophie Grabol as Christina Niilsen" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJ9abW0G2qYyk4C_2mLNwVF5gSkp7tUqMbyaejly76h08gStQhs1O1GAKno2HUFfaeQM6LkVJ9U5zofXAeKOSqk14Maop3KGb1AExYVTql3g0u922kSz-hsdH59_BnopvsxOSTT7zcJpA/s200/linden+_niilsen.jpeg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>Yo, AMC! You manage to score the original Sara Lund for your version of <em>The Killing</em>. We get that great moment in the parking garage when two actresses who play the same role on different continents face off, like some weird transporter accident from <em>Star Trek</em>. But this photo is the best you have for us? And you don't even note who the shadowy figure on the right is? For shame! Why don't we get to see Gråbøl's face too?<br />
<br />
I wonder if the Danes have flown out Mireille Enos for a cameo on the new season of <em>Forbrydelsen</em>?</blockquote><h4>Rhinestones and Butterflies</h4><blockquote><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia5tjrvbok5skZYpqKyV2ghsxJTXdgCujqYp3nih8H0ccQi8-dNSTN2Na7_3keCj97OC5qySrs20K_PBBMUtmw5rg4KFp_mZIbLCbvq5o6vI5oMfbOI-EZHMEh30W3GBIQrsKjsTkgNyg/s1600/rosiesbra.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEia5tjrvbok5skZYpqKyV2ghsxJTXdgCujqYp3nih8H0ccQi8-dNSTN2Na7_3keCj97OC5qySrs20K_PBBMUtmw5rg4KFp_mZIbLCbvq5o6vI5oMfbOI-EZHMEh30W3GBIQrsKjsTkgNyg/s200/rosiesbra.jpeg" width="200" /></a></div>The best piece of evidence that Rosie isn't a prostitute is the book bag her "killer" left on the Larsen front steps.<br />
<br />
Women who sell their bodies to high-end clients at night do not carry pink knapsacks bedecked with peace buttons by day. Some of the sophistication required for the casino job would have carried over to the typical teen hours of Rosie's life, something that we don't see here.<br />
<br />
Sure, I didn't own a hot pink lace bra at seventeen, but back in the day, we didn't have <a href="http://draft.blogger.com/">Victoria's Secret</a> in every shopping mall, either, so I don't find the underwear choice all that sophisticated.</blockquote><h4>The Most Telling Line of the Evening</h4><blockquote>Oh, Terry. We already suspected that the family couldn't really count on you. So when you tell Stan that <em>he</em> is "all the boys have right now," we thank you for confirming that fact with your Freudian slip!</blockquote><h4>Hide the Sharp Pieces of Jewelry</h4><blockquote>I understand why Stan returns to Janek Kovarsky to ask for mob justice for Rosie's death. Stan's life is in dizzying disarray: He's lost his daughter in an especially gruesome murder. Mitch, his support at home, and Belko, his sidekick at work, are both gone—Belko in a death just as senseless and horrifying as Rosie's. And the cops, from Stan's perspective at least, are imbeciles.<br />
<br />
But I am too skool'd in the ancients not to recognize that this request might call down even more harm on the Larsen family. Didn't Oedipus demand that the citizens of Thebes drive away the man whose pollution had sickened the city, not realizing that he himself had spawned the plague? Doesn't the seer Teiresias warn Oedipus that the king has eyes which do not see?<br />
<br />
I don't think for one minute that Stan murdered Rosie, not even inadvertently. But I do worry that in fulfilling Stan's request, Janek will put something in motion that will annihilate the family. I so don't need a character to go Jocasta and end up hanged from the rafters.</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-54620374626655732072012-04-01T19:11:00.000-04:002012-04-02T09:47:33.208-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Anticipating Night 13When I watch AMC's <em>The Killing</em>, I identify with the cops, not the parents or the politician. I want to be the one whose interpretation of the evidence finally identifies Rosie's murderer. If I catch myself screaming at the TV, it is always advice for Detectives Linden [Mireille Enos] and Holder [Joel Kinnaman]. As I wait for this evening's new episode, I have only the <a href="http://blogs.amctv.com/photo-galleries/the-killing-season-2-cast-gallery/stephen-sarah-terry-tom-stan-denny-mitch-jamie-darren-gwen.php" target="_blank">new gallery shots</a> to analyze. What do they reveal?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGcVNm-27LxZO5RASnRqJzblb62mRjDVNwq9NBoLDnKmSRiKAJmgJ4_81dxHA3fNUKYHdJWroNcL6RF4DdEElrbVP731k-jv2-36hoNz9E8uBfEN9gecAXNfz7GAlYeuUTDk4MZTXkyEo/s1600/holder_linden01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Joel Kinnaman as Stephen Holder and Mireille Enos as Sarah Linden" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGcVNm-27LxZO5RASnRqJzblb62mRjDVNwq9NBoLDnKmSRiKAJmgJ4_81dxHA3fNUKYHdJWroNcL6RF4DdEElrbVP731k-jv2-36hoNz9E8uBfEN9gecAXNfz7GAlYeuUTDk4MZTXkyEo/s200/holder_linden01.jpg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>
We can assume that Holder's "betrayal"—his fabrication of evidence that led to the arrest of mayoral candidate Darren Richmond [Billy Campbell]—gets explained in a manner that satisfies his partner. Their Season 2 photos do not reveal a big change in their attitudes toward one another or a tension that will jeopardize their working relationship. Their body language indicates that they are still a team, and those scowls reveal that they are ready to pursue the evidence wherever it takes them, even if they have to reach through the screen and drag a viewer back to Seattle for questioning.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYHLprBnJTI5KOLRjDOdCC6KjciklSslWv7U-klzvSpbWkzY5rne5EgYnxwyemKbZK-iWmRObhzBo3bFBv0QJNFgJj0itfv0Pc5b6BH7oBWeWI4UgEp9wmCUejExz3E4X7dGPjxoUrv8k/s1600/wright_eaton_richmond01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Eric Laden as Jamie Wright, Kristen Lehman as Gwen Eaton, and Billy Campbell as Darren Richmond" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYHLprBnJTI5KOLRjDOdCC6KjciklSslWv7U-klzvSpbWkzY5rne5EgYnxwyemKbZK-iWmRObhzBo3bFBv0QJNFgJj0itfv0Pc5b6BH7oBWeWI4UgEp9wmCUejExz3E4X7dGPjxoUrv8k/s200/wright_eaton_richmond01.jpg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>
Despite the assassination attempt, we don't see much of a shake up back at campaign headquarters, either. We can assume that Darren is sitting because a bullet through the abdomen would damage his core muscles enough that standing would be tiring and painful. Is he refusing to look us in the eye because he's ashamed that we know about his dalliances with the Beau Soleil girls? For his candidacy to have any chance at success, we must learn either that the "Orpheus" account is not his, or that the police will keep that information to themselves as their mistakes did get the poor guy shot in the first place. Jamie [Eric Ladin] can look us in the eye, but why won't Gwen [Kristen Lehman]? Should we keep her evasion in mind as Season 2 starts?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibarS5pqfY0XsFzI9-4GBaMUFEkJUNhRS5z-R7O9uj01goihGE1ngtpnO9Bjki6ybX6q7Xlbl8CEqz30hYnR-pmKiG4IVewIEAzedKRL-f2p6inoOvTradW8gx3088MTxLJ5qV6LDMhxM/s1600/larsens01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;" target="_blank"><img alt="Brent Sexton as Stan Larsen, Jamie Anne Allman as Terry Marek, and Michelle Forbes as Mitch Larsen" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEibarS5pqfY0XsFzI9-4GBaMUFEkJUNhRS5z-R7O9uj01goihGE1ngtpnO9Bjki6ybX6q7Xlbl8CEqz30hYnR-pmKiG4IVewIEAzedKRL-f2p6inoOvTradW8gx3088MTxLJ5qV6LDMhxM/s200/larsens01.jpg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>
The most insight into the new season comes in the Larsen photos. We remember, of course, that mother Mitch [Michelle Forbes] abandoned Stan [Brent Sexton] and the boys in the Season 1 finale. The photo nicely communicates that separation—as well as the insinuation of Terry [Jamie Anne Allman] into the ready-made family. Why, though, is Mitch looking away? Will her distance from the day-to-day routine at home let her see something that everyone else is missing and thus solve the murder? Is she feeling guilty about abandoning her responsibilities and so cannot meet our eyes? Or is she feeling guilty about something far worse, like Rosie's death? [According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Rosie had a <a href="http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/homicide/teens.cfm" target="_blank">20 percent chance</a> of dying at a family member's hand.]<br />
<br />
With the Larsen home is disarray, will Season 2 show us ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Another dishwasher malfunction?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">Cookie baking with Stan, Terry, and the boys?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">An inappropriate kiss between Stan and Terry?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">An inappropriate sexual encounter between Stan and Terry?</li>
</ol>
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVWS93BD10aVbyovruSnjjhZwxZ7TF-hExjY2Q4nQFqg-7tU1mlX1C63C7NfnuKmfCF7GLZzGhHhjKsx9nio7ruFUx10LCLQx7dDBoZE9Vh2WZwbn44qslJxOGR2iDtig7f7n3yn9o62M/s1600/mitchlarsen01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img alt="Michelle Forbes as Mitch Larsen" border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgVWS93BD10aVbyovruSnjjhZwxZ7TF-hExjY2Q4nQFqg-7tU1mlX1C63C7NfnuKmfCF7GLZzGhHhjKsx9nio7ruFUx10LCLQx7dDBoZE9Vh2WZwbn44qslJxOGR2iDtig7f7n3yn9o62M/s200/mitchlarsen01.jpg" title="" width="200" /></a></div>
And what do we make of Mitch standing alone in a bog? Is the water—and whatever it's symbolizing—flooding or receding? Is the sky lightening or graying? Will we be happy with Mitch's development over Season 2, or did Producer/Writer Veena Sud sacrifice the mother in some shocking manner to quiet the raucous critics whose lack of patience and undeserved sense of entitlement tried to ruin show?<br />
<br />
And did Ms. Forbes miss the <a href="http://tv.yahoo.com/photos/the-killing-season-2-la-premiere-slideshow/joel-kinnaman-and-mireille-enos-photo-1332980397.html" target="_blank">Season 2 LA premiere</a> because ...<br />
<ol>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">the cat hacked up a hairball on the dress she planned to wear, and she found no seltzer in the fridge to clean it off?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">unhappy with the turn her character took, she didn't want the cameras picking up the anger flashing in her eyes?</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">the negotiations with Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady to guest star as herself on next season's <em>The Big Bang Theory</em> ran way over?*</li>
<li style="list-style-type: upper-alpha;">she couldn't endure <a href="http://highlycollectibleautographs.blogspot.com/2012/03/killing-season-2-premiere.html" target="_blank">another autograph collector</a> <a href="http://autographhistory.blogspot.com/2012/03/killing-premiere-w-billy-campbell-joel.html" target="_blank">hounding her to sign</a> an Ensign Ro photo?</li>
</ol>
I guess we'll learn all the answers soon enough!<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">*How can I be the only one who has thought that Sheldon would finally have a worthy champion to defeat his nemesis Wil Wheaton in the actress who brought us Ensign Ro, Admiral Cain, and Maryann Forrester?</span>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Lake Como, Orlando, FL 32803, USA28.535972898423069 -81.35204315185546928.528997898423068 -81.361913651855474 28.542947898423069 -81.342172651855464tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-4774758645226032532011-06-25T23:01:00.023-04:002012-04-01T16:11:30.609-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 12<h4>
These Things I Know</h4>
<blockquote>
I still have my $50 as my friends have agreed that Councilman Richmond might be innocent. I know that next season I will consult the <a href="http://suspecttracker.amctv.com/">suspect tracker</a> to confirm that my candidate is on it before I make a new bet. [Damn you, Nathan!]<br />
<br />
I enjoyed the season finale because it mirrored in an accurate way how professionals behave. My experience has shown that in real life, professionals seldom finish any undertaking to perfection. We move, get promoted, or receive orders to drop one thing to start another. In real life, a fabricated piece of documentation stuck in a notebook to conclude a project is commonplace. Good enough suffices. In real life, we would thank Det. Holder for wrapping up the case so that the rest of us could begin our new assignments. In real life, Det. Linden might disagree with Holder's method, but she would have shrugged her shoulders, sighed, and stayed on the plane. In real life, we reach a point where advancing our lives takes precedence over getting mired in old responsibilities.<br />
<br />
I also know, however, that good enough will not satisfy Linden. If, in the excitement of arresting a mayoral candidate, her lieutenant forgot to take her badge, I assume that she is about to flash her credentials to a stewardess, delay the departure for everyone else on board that plane, and return to headquarters. Poor Jack. And poor Holder, who has some explaining to do!</blockquote>
<h4>
These Things I Hope Aren't True</h4>
<blockquote>
I cannot believe that Councilman Richmond killed Rosie. I haven't always liked the character, but as I run through everything I know about him, I cannot find a single good clue that would explain his drowning that girl. He does not have the win-at-any-cost mentality that justifies murder. He doesn't seem upset when Linden discovers his Orpheus screen name and goes about his day as if everything is okay. But we have Gwen saying that he disappeared that fateful Friday night and then returned to the bed & breakfast soaking wet. I'm more inclined to think Darren was suicidal and tried unsuccessfully to drown himself than homicidal and Rosie's murderer. But then we would have the unlikely coincidence that he tried to end it all the same night—and in the same way—that Rosie died.<br />
<br />
I still don't believe Rosie was a prostitute, either. Did I miss something? Why didn't anyone search those Beau Soleil records for Rosie's profile? We saw all of Celine/Aleena's information on the computer screen. Why didn't Linden and Holder find Rosie's if she was a girl for hire? <a href="http://news.cincinnati.com/article/20110619/ENT11/106190326/Producer-thrilled-by-success-Killing-">Yes, Ms. Sud, I know teenagers have secret lives.</a> In fact, I bet without exception we can <em>all</em> tell you how we misled our parents and behaved in ways that Mom and Dad would have found completely out of character. But still. Good-girl student by day, <em>hooker</em> by night? It won't work for me! And why was she banking her earnings under her aunt's name? Why not hide the cash in the globe with Bennet's notes?</blockquote>
<h4>
These Things I Wish I Knew</h4>
<blockquote>
Who is Holder helping to protect? When I think over the season, he has always enthusiastically jumped on a new suspect, without caring who it is. What we thought was Holder's inexperience might have been his intention to divert his partner [and us] from the truth—<em>anyone</em>, just so it's not the person who actually committed the murder. Now who could that person be?<br />
<br />
And who is in that car? I'm betting it's Gil, his Narcotics Anonymous sponsor. That man is the only character Holder owes enough to falsify evidence for. I believe Gil really is an NA sponsor, but does he also have connections to the mob? Mayor Adams? The casino? The Democratic National Committee?<br />
<br />
As Linden is rushing through the airport on her return <em>back</em> to the Seattle Police Department, will she bump into Mitch, ready to depart to places unknown, who says, "You know, I found something funny in Rosie's room," providing <em>the</em> clue to the real murderer?<br />
<br />
I guess I'll have to wait a year for answers!</blockquote>
I found this whole experience quite fun [but exhausting]. I will continue to watch <em>The Killing</em> even when Mitch Larsen is no longer a character.Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0Unknown location.28.536010600291153 -81.352086067199728.529035600291152 -81.361956567199712 28.542985600291154 -81.3422155671997tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-84555756885495400982011-06-18T23:01:00.017-04:002011-06-18T23:01:00.548-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 11<h4>Gettin' Skooled</h4><blockquote>So mayoral candidate Darren Richmond, more obsessed with the idea of drowning a pretty young girl than winning an election, took time out of his busy campaign schedule—at a time when anyone in Seattle would recognize him—to murder Rosie? And Rosie, a girl so shy that she could not speak up in class, so family oriented that her younger brothers could count on a bike ride with her after school, was living a secret life as a high-priced casino prostitute?<br />
<br />
Hmmm. I hear <em>The Killing</em> series creator Veena Sud asking, "Have I taught you nothing, Grasshopper?"<br />
<br />
That the councilman had involved himself in inappropriate sexual dalliances would surprise no one, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/17/nyregion/anthony-d-weiner-tells-friends-he-will-resign.html">especially this week</a>. But what evidence do we have that he killed Rosie?<br />
<br />
We know from the photos that Mayor Adams gave Gwen that Darren had spent time with Celine/Aleena, one of the Beau Soleil girls for hire. And we know that email sent to <strong>Orpheus@bockmail.com</strong> was appearing on Darren's computer. But Celine/Aleena did not say that the councilman was Orpheus, the creep who wondered what it was like to drown. Could someone with access to both <strong>Orpheus@bockmail.com</strong> and Darren's campaign email account be forwarding messages from one to the other? I control 4 email addresses from one Gmail account, so it's certainly possible. Campaign staffers, like Jamie and Gwen—and Nathan!—probably know Darren's password, and if they also have connections to the real "Orpheus," they could easily make the link. After viewing those photos, Gwen now has motivation for making Darren look bad.<br />
<br />
The best piece of evidence that Darren didn't kill Rosie, though, was being able to face Mitch and have that very moving conversation about loss in the grocery store. [The reason I never suspected Bennet* was that he was able to rescue Mitch from the high school hallway, take her into his classroom, and share Rosie's favorite poetry with her.] That kind of human-to-human connection is not possible if a couple of nights before you were closing the trunk on the mother's bound and beaten—though still living—daughter and then pushing the car into a lake where you knew she would drown.<br />
<br />
The second piece of evidence that Darren didn't do it was his loyalty to Bennet. If Darren had killed Rosie, why didn't he embrace Bennet as the suspect? It would have ended the investigation and protected his secret. We all know that innocent men, <a href="http://www.nodeathpenalty.org/new_abolitionist/february-2011-issue-53/kicking-death-penalty-out-illinois">especially minorities</a>, pay for crimes they didn't commit.<br />
<br />
And Rosie as a prostitute? I am more inclined to think that our artistic Rosie was getting paid to take those beautiful photos of the Beau Soleil girls. The best piece of evidence that Rosie is not a prostitute is that Mitch had to reassemble Rosie's room after Stan packed it up. Mitch would have found something that pointed to Rosie's second life—racy underwear, perhaps, or an ATM receipt—if it existed.</blockquote><h4>Roll Up Your Sleeve, Sir</h4><blockquote>After all the mystery surrounding Jack's father, we are expected to believe that some doof—sorry, Helo!—from Chicago is the missing parent? <a href="http://tradeitin4twinkies.blogspot.com/2011/06/killing-first-thoughts-night-10.html">My money is still on Darren.</a> When Linden makes <em>another</em> late night visit to the councilman's condo and is studying the photos of Darren and his late wife, I see her thought balloon: "You said you loved me. You said you would leave your wife. <em>We</em> could have been this happy."<br />
<br />
Draw some blood. I want a paternity test!</blockquote><h4>Step Aside, Linden! I've Solved It for You.</h4><blockquote>The medical examiner discovered that Rosie had floor cleaning solvent in her lungs and under her fingernails. Here's what must have happened: We know that Rosie and billionaire weirdo Tom Drexler have the Wapi Eagle Casino in common. They met there. Drexler invited Rosie over to help refinish the indoor basketball court. He's a weirdo, remember!<br />
<br />
As they were working, they began to argue about the merits of Super 8 film cameras vs. HD digital camcorders. Drexler managed to hold his temper until Rosie added that analog recording and vinyl records far surpassed the depth and warmth of music recorded digitally. As a man who had amassed his fortune in software development and the digital revolution, Drexler could not let that remark slide. He struck Rosie, who fell unconscious into a puddle of solvent, snuffling some of it into her lungs.<br />
<br />
When Gwen and Nathan arrived—remember, in Seattle you just show up at all hours, and remember, no one has confirmed Gwen's alibi for Friday night!—Drexler promised that he would help the Richmond campaign in any way if they got rid of the body. Thank god, Gwen had Nathan in tow, as her gym time hadn't developed enough arm muscle to wrestle a body in and out of a car. <br />
<br />
The two staffers planned just to dump Rosie in the park, but when they opened the trunk, Rosie leaped out. A chase through the woods ensued. Rosie tripped over a tree root and knocked herself unconscious on a rock. Nathan and Gwen could not rouse her and assumed she was dead. Panicky, Nathan pointed out that DNA evidence now existed in the trunk, so they loaded Rosie back in and pushed the vehicle into the lake, assuming that no one would find it. They did not know that Rosie was actually alive. And, of course, they never accounted for Det. Linden's super crime-scene sixth sense.<br />
<br />
Sorry, sorry. I'm just punchy after two and half months of having to think <em>too</em> much.</blockquote><h4>Video Teasers</h4><blockquote>Michelle Forbes discusses <em>The Killing</em>, among other things, here:<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="314" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gRV9NbkJOYA" width="500"></iframe><br />
<br />
And Brent Sexton indicates that the season finale will surprise us all:<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="314" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IFC9_SmchpM" width="500"></iframe></blockquote><span style="font-size: x-small;">*Now watch us discover that Bennet <em>did</em> do it!</span>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-53722747394800074102011-06-11T23:01:00.019-04:002011-06-11T23:01:00.582-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 10If I subtitled this post, I'd call it "So Far out in Left Field I'm on Hockey Ice."<br />
<br />
Has <em>The Killing</em> creative team gotten us so fixated on Rosie's murderer that we're not noticing while it sneaks in another big reveal just as shocking? One statement will answer all of these questions:<br />
<ol><li>In "Stonewalled," Det. Linden discovers that son Jack has forwarded Rosie's crime scene photos to his friends. After she reprimands him, Jack asks, "Why don't you send me to live with Dad?" Why does Linden answer, "Your dad left <em>ten years* ago</em>, so that probably won't happen. I'm all you've got"?</li>
<li>In "I'll Let You Know When I Get There," Regi comes home to find Jack and his friends smoking and drinking on her boat. Why does the exasperated Regi state, "It's not like I can call his dad"? And why does Linden say in response, "Of course you can't! It's all on me, Regi"?</li>
<li>In the same episode, why does Linden go <em>in person</em> to Councilman Richmond's condo <em>so late at night</em> to deliver the news that Bennet has been beaten, apologize for being wrong, and <em>share a glass of Scotch</em>?</li>
<li> And, in the same episode, why does fiancé Rick <em>not</em> offer to take Jack to Sonoma so that Linden can solve Rosie's case in peace? [Taking Jack would have guaranteed that Linden eventually arrive!]</li>
<li>In "Missing," when Det. Holder asks, "What about his real dad?" why does Linden shut him down with "Enough with the twenty questions"?</li>
<li>And, in the same episode, why is there no time spent on the campaign storyline?</li>
<li>And what piece of information would really integrate the campaign storyline into the rest of the series?</li>
<li>Councilman Richmond must have a dark secret; all politicians do. I really don't think he killed Rosie, so what don't we know about the councilman?</li>
<li>And what knowledge, in the previews for "Beau Soleil," is Mayor Adams trying to share with Gwen?</li>
</ol>The answer? <em>Jack is the secret bastard son of Councilman Richmond.</em> Jack certainly didn't get that shock of dark hair from his mother. You heard this nonsense here first!<br />
<br />
Alas, I probably just have <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-arnold-maria-statement-20110518,0,5890279.story">former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger</a> and <a href="http://www.thestate.com/2011/06/04/1845848/the-rise-and-fall-of-john-edwards.html">former US senator John Edwards</a> on the brain. Although I am also thinking that the writers have missed a huge opportunity here. Or maybe they haven't. We'll see.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">*The councilman has been in public office ten years.</span>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-91765717349100607902011-06-04T23:01:00.005-04:002011-06-04T23:01:00.192-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 9<h4>Seven Seasons of <em>Homicide: Life on the Street</em> Taught Me Something</h4><blockquote>One of my favorite episodes of <em>Homicide</em> is "In Search of Crimes Past." A convicted murderer on death row is facing execution, so his daughter, convinced of Dad's innocence, kidnaps Colonel Barnfather to force another look at her father's case. Lieutenant Giardello orders Stanley Bolander, the original primary, to reinvestigate. Bolander learns that a bartender withheld a piece of important information—not maliciously but because Bolander hadn't asked the right question during the interview. The episode ends with Bolander wondering how many times in how many investigations he neglected to ask the right question.<br />
<br />
One of the things that I love about <em>The Killing</em> is that we [both the audience and the detectives] get caught up in the action and fail to ask for really simple—though potentially important—information. It's day 10 in the murder investigation, and there's a lot we don't know.<br />
<br />
For example, what does Terry do for a living? The first time I saw her, I thought steak-house waitress, a profession that would leave her free during the day to hang with Mitch and the kids. Next, based on her style of dress, I decided bartender, maybe. Then, when her mother came to the house and said to Mitch, "Yeah, some life your sister has!" I wondered if she was an escort, a call girl, a "masseuse"? <br />
<br />
Now I'm wondering if she's a blackjack dealer or a cocktail waitress <em>at the Wapi Eagle Casino</em>. Why hasn't anyone asked for Terry's whereabouts that fateful Friday night? I don't think that Terry killed Rosie, but I'm wondering if she has an important piece of information that the right question will reveal.</blockquote><h4>If Fingertips Had Eyes</h4><blockquote>I'm still convinced the shoes are important. That evidence bag containing them just sat right in front of Linden all episode. She threw the bag into the box when she learned Bennet was hurt; she obviously handled it again when she spread all of the evidence back onto the table. Would someone <em>please</em> reexamine the shoes and ask, "Where did Rosie get these?"</blockquote><h4>T.O.D.</h4><blockquote>Why are we [the audience and the detectives] convinced that Rosie died Friday night? The coroner indicated that her time of death was anywhere from Friday through Monday, the long stretch a result of the soaking in the car trunk. The detectives, though, ask for Friday night alibis. Just because the Richmond campaign car was reported missing on Saturday morning doesn't mean it went into the lake Friday night. Rosie might have been alive Saturday or Sunday, making everyone's Friday night alibi irrelevant!<br />
<br />
I loved that an intern found campaign video with the councilman shaking Rosie's hand. Our victim making contact with the candidate in a crowd of supporters was an instant reminder of the <a href="http://www.cah.utexas.edu/photojournalism/detail.php?nickname=halstead&picid=6">photos that emerged</a> after Independent Counsel Ken Starr accused President Clinton of having improper contact with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Are we supposed to make a connection between Clinton and Richmond? Clinton denied having "sexual relations" with Lewinsky even though the blue dress proved he did. Richmond denies involvement with Rosie. Should we believe him?<br />
<br />
Gwen may have provided an alibi for Darren on Friday night, but what about Saturday? Sunday? We've learned that he likes to sneak off by himself. I think the councilman might be the last of the red herrings. I predict the video will get leaked, and we [the audience and the detectives] will have to reinvestigate poor Darren one more time, but he's off my suspect list. There would be no satisfaction in discovering that he murdered Rosie.</blockquote><h4>Temporal Relativity, Again</h4><blockquote>Despite what <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/05/the_killing_recap_not_dead_aga.html">others</a> <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/30/the_killing_season_one_episode_10">are saying</a>, Linden is not a bad cop. We've had <em>two months</em> to figure out who killed Rosie Larsen—plus, fly-on-the-wall status that has given us information Linden doesn't know. So who is it, huh? We don't know! Linden has had only <em>ten days</em>, and I'd wager that she figures it out long before we do.</blockquote><h4>Special Message to Papa Bear</h4><blockquote>The Stan we know would have "finished business" with the teacher, but I really like you, and <a href="http://www.doc.wa.gov/offenderinfo/capitalpunishment/">Washington State has the death penalty</a>. So I am now happy that you didn't kill Bennet, and I have to hope that he not only lives but also recovers.</blockquote><h4>Oh, Please, No</h4><blockquote>The cheesiest ending for Season 1 would be Bennet regaining consciousness during Amber's first visit with their newborn daughter.</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-41669461065514752022011-05-28T23:01:00.397-04:002011-05-31T10:53:24.644-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 8<h4>The Adriana Moment</h4><blockquote>After watching "Undertow" on Sunday, I thought <em>The Killing</em> might have reached The Adriana Moment for me. The Adriana Moment is when a television show makes me feel so disgusted with my species—and with me as a member of it—that I can't follow the story any longer; it refers to the episode of <em>The Sopranos</em> when, on Tony's orders, Silvio executes Adriana. Yes, Adriana had provided information to the FBI. No, she wasn't exactly a civilian; she was involved—at the periphery, not in important ways—in mob business. But still. Sweet, dumb Adriana? Driven into the woods—<a href="http://tradeitin4twinkies.blogspot.com/2011/05/killing-first-thoughts-night-6.html">there we go again</a>—and shot? Her death was nauseating, but I, like the rest of the audience, experienced the story from Tony's perspective. He had a family, a "business," a lifestyle to protect. She had to die. And when I understood that necessity, I quit watching. I was horrified that on one level I agreed with Tony's orders. I didn't tune in again until the series finale when I hoped Tony would get his [while simultaneously praying that he didn't].<br />
<br />
So when Stan [my favorite character] killed* Bennet [my second favorite character], I was really upset. Was Bennet's kidnapping and beating plausible? Certainly. Motivated? Yes. Stan didn't know what the audience did, that Detectives Linden and Holder—and Mitch with the discovery of Rosie's <em>actual</em> pink T-shirt—had cleared Bennet of guilt**, and so, as an archetypal figure who had demonstrated perfect grief, his perfect rage should not have surprised me. But still. The poor little frog who just wanted his place at the table? Punched and kicked, his head cracked, no prince magically emerging after the violence? I felt that same disgust with my species that Adriana's death had provoked.</blockquote><h4>Bloody Lips, Eh?</h4><blockquote>But then, my interest in the story, my commitment to continue watching, was saved.<br />
<br />
I learned early in <a href="http://tradeitin4twinkies.blogspot.com/2009/11/before-we-get-started.html">this project</a> <em>not</em> to read anyone else's thoughts on a work until <em>after</em> I had written my own. Good writers can persuade me to arrive at opinions I wouldn't reach myself, so I avoid their reviews until I have written mine.<br />
<br />
With <em>The Killing</em>, however, I have followed the weekly episode recaps/analyses at <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/the-killing/">The Los Angeles Times</a> and <a href="http://nymag.com/tv/the-killing/">New York Magazine.</a> [I rationalize this indulgence by telling myself that these posts of mine are not really <em>reviews</em>.] So on Monday morning, I wanted to see what the professionals had to say. I was shocked to discover that Todd VanDerWerff of <em>The Los Angeles Times</em> and Andy Greenwald of <em>New York Magazine</em> were blaming the series, the genre—not Stan's horrific action, not the consequences of it, not their own willingness to embrace the teacher as suspect—for the bad taste that "Undertow" had left in their mouths.<br />
<br />
Obviously, all the fat red herrings, dangled on sharp hooks, had bloodied up these boys' lips. Instead of taking responsibility for swallowing so many of them in the first place, they were now faulting the series for cheap coincidences. <br />
<br />
Don't you guys get it? Thirteen [13!] hours on one [1!] murder means that this show is a game, a puzzle, a tussle, like the purchase of a used car from a salesman with a combover. You cannot be a passive viewer, upset that you've been tricked, outfoxed, suckered into a higher price than you needed to pay. You have to <em>expect</em> that your opponent is smarter [in this matter], cheating you, fooling you! This is where the <em>fun</em> is! <br />
<br />
And by the way, if this series had been set in New York, no one would find two "I <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #cc0000;">♥</span> NY" T-shirts improbable; if this series had been set in Florida, two girls owning pink Walt Disney World T-shirts would not be out of the question. The Grand Canyon and Seattle are both West US; the two T-shirts [not identical—go back and look] do not seem a cheap coincidence. The Grand Canyon is a close enough destination for Washington families to take their kids on vacation.<br />
<br />
I think the real reason these writers were upset is that like the unthinking masses they believe themselves too educated and worldly to be a part of, they too had thought the worst of a teacher—one who had a believable explanation every time the evidence pointed his way. I'm not certain why this teacher bashing happens. My theory is that young people are pulled in two directions: where their parents want them to go [same church, same political leanings, same social class] and where their teachers indicate they can go. Most people follow the path their families have laid out, and they later resent their teachers for inspiring dreams they didn't have the courage to pursue. This resentment turns into voting decisions that punish teachers with low pay and little respect—all the while, everyone still expects sacrifices and miracles in the classroom that Jesus himself would tire of performing. For every <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Kay_Letourneau">Mary Kay Letourneau</a>, thousands of teachers leave for school every morning—as Bennet tried to do—to do their jobs, and well.<br />
<br />
So I am ready to go head-to-head with <em>The Killing</em> creative team to try to determine who the bad guy is. I don't mind if future episodes prove me wrong. It's all part of the fun.</blockquote><h4>Plausibility and Satisfaction</h4><blockquote>I'm still convinced the $2,000 shoes and the end-of-the-line bus rides are important early clues that Linden and Holder did not given sufficient attention. Who has the money to purchase such expensive footwear for Rosie? Who would have an interest in the basketball program?<br />
<br />
<strong>Councilman Richmond:</strong> Darren is the sponsor of the Seattle All-Stars and has a sizable campaign budget, so he might have met Rosie at the All-Star headquarters and could swing the purchase of the shoes. Clues of his involvement include 1) no one checking Gwen's claim that she was with him, out of town, the weekend Rosie disappeared [so he might not actually have an alibi], and 2) the freaky spider-in-a-web reflection when he smashes the bathroom mirror, which inspires that Oh-what-tangled-webs-we-weave-when-first-we-practice-to-deceive rhyme in my head. Plausible? No, I can't see Darren and Gwen pushing that big black car—their own expensive shoes caking with shore muck—into the lake. Satisfying? Only for people who like to see the really virtuous toppled as hypocrites.<br />
<br />
<strong>Mayor Adams:</strong> We know the mayor is a sleaze. Clues of his involvement include 1) shady development deals giving the mayor enough money to buy designer shoes, and 2) the discovery of Rosie's body in a Richmond campaign car, which has certainly helped him pull ahead in the polls. Plausible? Not really. Unlike Stan, for instance, he does not seem capable of getting his hands the kind of dirty that would require chasing Rosie through the woods, tying her up, and drowning her in the trunk. Satisfying? No, we want someone whose sleaziness comes as an <em>unexpected</em> surprise.<br />
<br />
<strong>Tom Drexler:</strong> Our Seattle billionaire seems so numb to regular human pleasures that his stimulation includes illegal cage fights and $5 million free-throw bets. Was he playing midnight pick-up games in the bad part of town to feel something, <em>anything</em>—and there met Rosie? Would his amorality and world weariness inspire him to stage a "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Most_Dangerous_Game">Most Dangerous Game</a>," where the wealthy aristocrat hunts another human being for sport? Plausible? Hardly. Satisfying? No. We have only fanciful speculation, no hard clues. Our satisfaction will arrive from seeing where we erred in our interpretation of <em>real</em> evidence.<br />
<br />
<strong>Michael Ames:</strong> Jasper's father has the money to buy the shoes. He doesn't have a connection to the Seattle All-Stars—or to basketball, for that matter—but he does have two connections to Rosie, his son and Rosie's Aunt Terry.*** We know he doesn't mind getting his hands dirty, as we saw him slap Jasper on the first evening. And like Bennet, he came to the wake, was in Mitch's house, ate her food. That the wrong man paid for that affront would be a nice piece of irony. Plausible? If Mr. Ames had "stolen" Rosie from Jasper, it would explain Kris's comment that Jasper hated Rosie. Satisfying? I certainly wouldn't mind the man who raised such an entitled little prick eventually going down.<br />
<br />
Okay, creative team, prove me wrong!</blockquote><span style="font-size: x-small;">*Bennet needs to be dead. Stan knows what he's doing. On life support in an intensive care unit will not work for me, as much as I like both Bennet and Stan.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">**That Bennet is the actual killer—his vindication after Muhammed's interrogation the biggest, fattest, juciest red herring of them all—is still possible. Although after chaperoning the dance so late <em>and</em> moving Aisha to a safer location, when would he have had time to kill and dispose of a body? That's too busy a night for <em>anyone</em>.</span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: x-small;">***I won't be surprised to learn that Aunt Terry inadvertently set up Rosie's death. Even she might not know it yet. Maybe a "girls' night out" while the clueless parents were camping initiated Rosie's meeting with her murderer. Maybe that explains what Rosie's textbooks were doing in Terry's car.</span>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-12511728329768003692011-05-21T23:01:00.019-04:002011-05-21T23:01:00.529-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 7<h4>Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me</h4><blockquote>"El Diablo," the third episode, had me convinced that Jasper and Kris hurt Rosie. Why? The pink wig in the cellphone video that Bennet confiscated matched the one Rosie wore in the yearbook video from the dance. Now Det. Linden has a pink T-shirt. Actually, just a photo of a pink T-shirt. No forensic evaluation of the garment at all. We're not even sure of its size. Mitch might recognize the T-shirt as Rosie's, but she also admitted that Rosie had lost it. Uh-uh. No way. I'm not doing another Charlie Brown to the writers' Lucy! They can hold that football, but this time, I will not launch a kick at it just so they can pull it away.</blockquote><h4>Sibling Rivalry</h4><blockquote>Am I the only one angry at Terry for telling Stan that Mitch almost asphyxiated the boys? On the one hand, I was so relieved that Terry threw open the garage door. But her behavior is typical of a younger sister trying to win points with the authority figure! I am the older of two sisters. Perhaps my own unresolved family issues are keeping me from seeing Terry as the selfless, suffering savior who has dropped everything to help her big sister in this tragedy. <br />
<br />
I just get the impression that Terry doesn't have much of a life. She seems to be living vicariously through Mitch because she cannot handle the difficult responsibility of a full-time family of her own. Terry now has three strikes: 1) blaming Mitch for not calling Rosie while the family was camping [when she didn't call either], 2) getting involved with Jasper's father—in what way, I'm not clear, but from the amount of Terry's cleavage I've seen, I'm assuming sexually—and now 3) ratting out her sister, who couldn't help but get distracted in the living room with the local news about to show Rosie's crime scene photos to all of Seattle.</blockquote><h4>Temporal Relativity</h4><blockquote>We've been stewing in the Larsens' grief for seven weeks now. I understand that Stan wants Mitch to snap out of it. The only problem is that the audience's seven weeks is Mitch's eight days. Come on, Papa Bear! You can't start removing Rosie's possessions after eight days! I know you box and store things for a living, but please! <br />
<br />
Perhaps this scene is a plot device to allow mother Mitch, as she reassembles the bedroom, to find the BIG CLUE that everyone has thus far missed. We're counting on you, Mitch! Keep your eyes peeled!</blockquote><h4>Got Your Back, Bennet</h4><blockquote>On the one hand, Bennet says—over a newly wiretapped phone, no less!—"The passports will be arriving tomorrow ... Don't worry about the police. They don't know anything." But does anyone have a translation for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Somalia">Somali</a> that Bennet speaks before lapsing into the English that conveniently points to his guilt? Does anyone know what <em>this</em> Mohammad is saying at the other end of the line? Do we not realize that Amber is influencing our understanding of this scene as we see her eavesdropping around the corner? We cannot trust her distrust! Remember, poor Amber does not have a cool head. She is exhausted from the pregnancy and worried about the escalating situation and impending birth of her first child. This is the girl who deals with people knocking at the front door by hiding in a corner while clutching a hammer!<br />
<br />
Did Det. Holder ever determine why Rosie skipped school to visit the Seattle All-Star gym? Did he find out whom she visited or helped? Or did Holder just see Bennet's photograph in the trophy case and jump to a wrong conclusion?</blockquote><h4>Tap Your Heels</h4><blockquote>If <em>The Killing</em> has tapped into an old narrative, the expensive shoes found in Rosie's locker are an important clue, for they are symbolic of transformation. Think Cinderella from the Grimm Brothers and Dorothy from <em>The Wizard of Oz</em>. If we knew the type of change Rosie desired, we'd have a better idea who the killer is. Why hasn't Linden or Holder tried to find who purchased those $2,000 shoes? How many stores in Seattle could sell such expensive footwear?</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-28945921728610936232011-05-14T23:01:00.034-04:002011-05-14T23:01:01.373-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 6<h4>A Review of a Review</h4><blockquote><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkzBoaozcFZ5fJrjsjLeboqcx430a1zuJHuFgA4MA47iJc7N31qgLbKpvFAV9qp_8Ll3eArRGt8LS3J2mIE35Xh_ud67XDZ-hvkLGJ72k5PYllP_pqh6j3w5C0wRYjxxQyu569oqqXF2I/s1600/newyorker_thekilling.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkzBoaozcFZ5fJrjsjLeboqcx430a1zuJHuFgA4MA47iJc7N31qgLbKpvFAV9qp_8Ll3eArRGt8LS3J2mIE35Xh_ud67XDZ-hvkLGJ72k5PYllP_pqh6j3w5C0wRYjxxQyu569oqqXF2I/s200/newyorker_thekilling.jpg" width="146" /></a></div>Dear Ms. Franklin:<br />
<br />
When my highbrow friends deign to watch TV, <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/television/2011/05/09/110509crte_television_franklin">your opinion</a> has way more influence than mine. So when one of them said, "<i>The New Yorker</i> reviewed that show you go on about” and handed me last week’s magazine, the pages folded back to reveal Mireille Enos’s caricature, I knew I could give up trying to sell the show to the eggheads. Nothing I now say can compete with your dismissal of <i>The Killing</i>.<br />
<br />
I don’t entertain any fantasies that I can change your mind about the series, but I do want to address a couple of your complaints.<br />
<br />
I disagree that the chase scene that opens the series is just “creepy exploitation” of violence against teenaged girls. Rosie’s run through the forest [and those aerial shots showing the West Coast wilds slinking along the city’s edge] awaken our memories of the fairy tales Grandma read to us as children—the ones meant to give us the skills to avoid trouble: stay on the path, don’t talk to strangers, avoid nibbling other people’s possessions. <br />
<br />
I now realize that Grandma wanted us to avoid her own mistakes, for everyone must make a run through that forest, either literal or figurative, as a compulsory rite of passage. We could pledge good behavior while we snuggled on Grandma’s lap, a picture book open in front of us, but when our curiosity and hunger for experience took us—inevitably—into the woods, those fairy-tale strategies were wholly inadequate. We didn’t know where to go when we found ourselves in the wrong part of town, what to say [or keep to ourselves] when we engaged that strange man in conversation, what to do when we swallowed something we should have declined. <br />
<br />
Sometimes young people get pushed into an oven and roasted, sometimes thrown in a car trunk and drowned. Rosie reminds us of that reality. More often, though, we escape the forest with our lives, though our experience there does do some irrevocable damage. And the extent of that damage makes the characters of <i>The Killing</i> so compelling that I don't understand how you can dismiss them as superficial.<br />
<br />
We learn, for example, that Stan Larsen [Brent Sexton], Rosie’s father, spent early adulthood in the belly of a wolf, and that experience gives him not only an instinctual ferocity but also painful doubts about his humanity. We saw him go for Jasper’s throat with the precision of a predator; we saw empathy triumph over violence as he released the teacher rather than deliver the death blow. <br />
<br />
Aunt Terry [Jamie Anne Allman], on the other hand, must have encountered an unsympathetic huntsman when she wound her way through the woods. This man left her internal organs intact but removed a metaphorical heart, which now keeps her from making the kind of commitment that would let her marry and raise children as her sister has. [And I hope that we don’t learn that Terry's loss influenced a bad decision with the man who hurt Rosie.]<br />
<br />
Det. Holder [Joel Kinnaman] knows the pebble path home, but whatever he consumed to stuff his emptiness allows him to open the mailbox only, not the front door. Poor Bennet Ahmed [Brandon Jay McLaren], like the frog prince, is willing to do the work to get a place at the table—the kingly Councilman Richmond [Billy Campbell] ensuring his rights—when everyone else just wants to smash him against the wall for his differences.<br />
<br />
And mother Mitch [Michelle Forbes] has made the evil Queen sympathetic. As she looks through the window of the Ahmeds’ apartment [this story’s mirror], painfully aware of what she has lost [not superficial cosmetic appearance this time], we almost wish she could recover a still-living daughter—even at Amber’s expense. These characters illustrate the successful journey out of the forest in a way Grandma and the Grimm Brothers never did, and we understand the damage and losses these adults suffer because we know them ourselves.<br />
<br />
I have no experience with the way television networks promote their series, but I do know that in my profession, the marketing department does not consult those of us in the trenches as it builds an image to sell our services. So I can’t help but wonder if twenty-somethings too young to have watched <i>Twin Peaks</i> thought their provocative question “Who Killed Rosie Larsen?” was an original ploy to generate interest in a new show. You can’t count on the marketing folks having the same background as a television scholar like yourself, and it’s unfair to penalize the series and its creative team for something over which it might not have had any control.<br />
<br />
What your review did for my highbrow friends is provide them with a couple of one-liners so that if <i>The Killing</i> ever comes up in conversation—they have to know everything, you understand—I can now count on someone saying, “That show made me feel as if I was in an abusive relationship,” for they do like to plagiarize you without doing the heavy lifting of actually watching the series for themselves. <br />
<br />
Meanwhile, my lowbrow friends and I are preparing a series finale beer-and-pizza party—alas, we can’t sit around eating bowls of Fruit Zooms and Bits’n’Pieces—where I am sure I will learn that I have made a foolish $50 bet on Nathan being Rosie’s killer.</blockquote><h4>My Head Hurts</h4><blockquote>News of a mysterious Mohammad and the FBI take-down of Linden and Holder have exploded the variables competing for attention in my head. We can’t have a new suspect this late in the game! Not after I have hyper-analyzed the most insignificant bits of conversation and body language. Are blackberries in ditches on the councilman’s mind because he observed them while helping Nathan push the car into the lake? Why does Terry light up at Mr. Ames’s entrance to the wake while his crone of a wife (?) puckers her already sour mouth? I feel like I’m in the middle of a chess game when the size of the board and number of pieces have just doubled! What are the rules now?</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-62798388204794498362011-05-07T23:01:00.006-04:002011-05-08T10:52:21.998-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 5If I could talk directly to the characters, I'd have some things to say:<br />
<br />
<h4>For Detective Linden:</h4><blockquote>I know Bennet is looking guilty [of something], and I know an eyeball witness will give you your all-important probable cause for a search warrant. But really, girlfriend, you cannot trust Mr. Astronomer—who, if you had pressed, would have admitted alien abduction next. FYI, you can't track ultraviolet emissions and radio waves with a telescope, and "gamma-rads" don't exist! This means everything he claims to have seen from his second-story perch is suspect, including two people removing a body from the Ahmeds' apartment.<br />
<br />
Did you not notice the big belly on Amber? Do you really think Bennet would have let his very pregnant wife help carry a dead body? Doesn't he seem capable of doing heavy lifting himself?<br />
<br />
The audience has eavesdropped on the Ahmeds' lives, and we've watched them happily preparing for their baby girl, not agonizing over their bad decisions last Friday night, not paranoid about when the cops are going to break down the door and haul them off to jail.<br />
<br />
We did get to see Amber crouched in a corner, a hammar in hand, while you banged outside on the apartment door. I don't think that hammer is the weapon used to subdue Rosie; I think we just have a scared pregnant girl trying to protect her dreams of a happy future—the one she had before you cops started jumping to conclusions after listening to the wacky, racist neighbor.<br />
<br />
We need to see some more of your long, thoughtful pauses. We all know you're not going to Sonoma. Stop letting your departure flight rush your decision making!</blockquote><h4>For Councilman Richmond:</h4><blockquote>Your campaign seems to have imploded. I know everyone is going to blame your loyalty to Bennet, which, let's face it, was politically naive. But I was really proud of you. You know first-hand how forces outside of your control can ruin happiness. I'm glad that you didn't unleash the power of your position on poor Bennet.<br />
<br />
I can't believe the campaign storyline is over. To resurrect your chances of winning, we need to learn that the mayor [or someone in his camp] killed Rosie.<br />
<br />
Mr. Astronomer claimed to have seen someone "kind of like" Linden dump a body into a car. Let's say the body dump did happen. Linden assumed someone "kind of like" her meant a woman, so she jumped to Bennet's wife. But Mr. Astronomer might have meant someone light haired. Gwen is blond, isn't she? You have been resisting a full commitment to her all season. Obviously, you have trust issues with the woman. Did the cops ever confirm that she was with you on Friday night, or did they just take her word for it as proof of <em>your</em> alibi? Of course, Jamie is blond too. And Nathan has light hair. That Nathan, I still don't like him.<br />
<br />
Someone "kind of like" Linden might have meant <em>someone not yet probed aboard an alien spaceship</em>, in which case <em>every sane person</em> is back on the suspect list.</blockquote><h4>To Papa Bear Stan</h4><blockquote>Have you seen a doctor lately? You're a big guy. I think I can safely assume that salads and steamed vegetables don't make up the majority of your diet. Did the doc prescribe cholesterol-lowering medicine? Are you good about taking it? I can't watch you throw around any more heavy metal boxes. I was so worried that you were going to stroke out or collapse, your hands clutching your heart. Be careful about that.<br />
<br />
Now, let's talk about the teacher. Think for a minute! You're going to off someone based on hearsay from a groundskeeper? A friend of Belko, who has already demonstrated his own racial prejudices? You have indicated that you don't harbor the same bad feelings about the Somalis in the city. Please! Pull off the road! Tell the teacher that you got lost in your own head for a moment and missed the exit. He'll believe you, considering the circumstances. Take him home. Living with the guilt of killing an innocent man will make you miserable; you'll have committed the same crime that took Rosie away from your family. If the teacher is guilty, let the cops and court mete out the punishment.</blockquote><h4>To Bennet Ahmed</h4><blockquote>Are you aware that you're just a character on a television show? That fact gives you an advantage. As you are the only significant character of color on <em>The Killing</em>, I can't imagine that the writers will make you Rosie's murderer. It would be too politically incorrect. I want you to be innocent because you've impressed me in the classroom and with the Seattle All-Stars. But I think your biggest advantage is that we're going to need a Caucasian to have committed the crime.</blockquote>I love good music closing a television episode, and I found Neko Case's "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0vk5SGmw3w">Hold On, Hold On</a>" an especially moving song for last week's episode. Of course the even bigger question is why Jasper's father sent Terry into that drunken tailspin.Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-18550102783510153542011-04-30T23:01:00.012-04:002011-05-09T10:29:59.725-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 4<h4>Product (Re)Placement</h4><blockquote><em>The Killing</em> has done an excellent job inserting me into the world of Rosie's death—until "Super 8." As much as I hate to see television characters promoting products, I also dislike when fictional brands with clever names distract me from the story. Bits'n'Pieces, the cereal atop the Larsens' refrigerator, first got the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPyNsB2BDRE">Kibbles 'n Bits</a> chant running through my head; I wondered why the writers would use dog food as inspiration for a breakfast item. Then, as Mitch was grocery shopping in the cereal aisle, I thought, "Oh, I get it! The Larsens are in <em>bits and pieces</em> as a result of this family upheaval! Or wait! We are getting clues about the murder in <em>bits and pieces</em>! How clever! Now what clue is 'Fruit Zooms' providing that I'm missing?" Eventually, I realized that Mitch and the councilman—where had he come from?—were having an important conversation full of character insight, and I had to back up the episode to catch it all. I want to stay in the story, not have clever details detour me into my own head.</blockquote><h4>Stan's Head</h4><blockquote>I once had a colleague who spent a long vacation riding cross country on a 10-speed. He was hit and killed in New Mexico. When we got news of his death, someone said, "Thank god Bob finished X before he left." Now X was indeed important, and only Bob could have completed it successfully, but the comment indicated that Bob's contribution to X was more important than his life. This experience taught me that death doesn't necessarily inspire noble thoughts in the still-living.<br />
<br />
When Stan has his meltdown in the bathroom, we see a father's anguish for his dead daughter. But we don't hear what he is thinking. At first, we imagine that "Oh, my poor Rosie" is reverberating in his head. But we watched Stan's business and finances suffer in this episode, and I can't help wonder if "That girl has ruined everything!" or "The children were Mitch's responsibility. Why didn't she keep Rosie safe?" is spinning around in there too. I'm worried that Papa Bear is about to blow, and I don't want to learn that he smacks his wife or children. Mitch did allude to a temper in the first episode.</blockquote><h4>Let's Ride It Again!</h4><blockquote><a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/04/the_killing_recap_bitsnpieces.html">Professional reviewers</a> have begun commenting on the repetitive nature of a weekly suspect dismissed by night's end, but these red herrings don't bother me at all. A who-done-it is formulaic, as is a haiku or sonnet, a Big Mac or roller coaster. We enjoy gauging how successfully the writer, grill cook, or engineer has worked within the constraints. On a roller coaster, for example, I know that once the steep ascent begins—clack, clack, clack, clack, clack—a long, stomach-flipping fall will follow. When I am watching <em>The Killing</em>, the climb to a new suspect fills me with the same anticipation, and the swift twists and turns to his eventual alibi leave me exhilarated. What happens at the end of a roller coaster ride? The same thing that happens at the end of a <em>Killing</em> episode. I want to get on again.<br />
<br />
I do hope that Bennett Ahmed [Brandon Jay McLaren], Rosie's English teacher and the new prime suspect, is a quick ride. I get so tired of the inaccurate depictions of teachers—either selfless saviors or slimy seducers. Bennett has brought a realism to the profession: He's not full of flamboyant stunts. He's not unpocketing his secret cool to impress the Jaspers in the room. He's not a burnout oblivious to the spark of potential that he sees in young people. He had the professionalism to start dating the student he married after she had graduated. If he turns out to be Rosie's murderer—or worse yet, a serial killer who dumps bodies in stolen cars—I am going to be really disappointed.</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-65802166816193491602011-04-23T23:01:00.065-04:002011-04-26T09:34:36.751-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 3<h4>Get Your Greek On</h4><blockquote>“He will steal your money and then stab you in the balls,” warns Tom Drexler [Patrick Gilmore], a wealthy, powerful Seattleite. Drexler makes this assessment of Mayor Adams [Tom Butler], the incumbent, but the stab-you-in-the-balls comment calls up Cronos, the ancient Greek god who castrated his father Uranus and took control of the universe. Cronos and Mayor Adams have a number of similarities besides ball stabbing; they both have to worry that younger challengers will grab their place and power. Cronos tried to thwart his own foretold ruin by swallowing each of his children after they were born; Mayor Adams consumes resources/tax dollars in a way that weakens the people who most need help and change. <br />
<br />
But the paradigm requires that a young upstart takes down the powerful and corrupt: Cronos's son Zeus, whose mother raised him in secret after feeding her husband a blanket-swaddled stone, usurps his father, just as the handsome and vibrant Councilman Richmond hopes to remove Mayor Adams from office. The details change; the stories never do.<br />
<br />
One thought that occurred to me on the first night of the series—one reinforced every episode since—is that my own parents would not react the way the Larsens do. It’s not that my parents don’t love me; my family just doesn’t do such physical and single-minded displays of emotion. My father would never try to barrel his way past a police blockade, nor would he crumple to his knees in tears. My mother would be upset, but her grief would compete with annoyance that my murder had inconvenienced her schedule and embarrassment that I had died in such a public manner.<br />
<br />
We love Mitch and Stan because they are idealized depictions of how we would want our own parents to mourn us. Poor Papa Bear, who can’t afford a new dishwasher in the series pilot, now must ensure that his Goldilocks has the just-right casket, for this time her run through the forest did not conclude in a successful return home.<br />
<br />
Mitch’s grief follows an even more ancient pattern, that of Demeter suffering the loss of her daughter Persephone, whom Hades kidnapped to the underworld. Like Demeter, she has shut down. If mortal Mitch had Demeter’s power to denude the trees and gray the skies, I believe she would, all the rest of us humans be damned. A nice touch is that <em>The Killing</em> is set in October when the weather has provided the physical consequences of Demeter’s sorrow.<br />
<br />
This is the real gift Michelle Forbes brings to a role. Her performance never gives us a filtered or diluted sip from the archetype; it flows straight from the wellspring. Think Maryann of <em>True Blood</em> [chaos personified] or Pen Verrity of <em>Durham County</em> [not an Andrea Yates or Susan Smith, but the intelligent and complicated Medea]. When Rosie's BFF Sterling Fitch [Kasey Rohl] finds Mrs. Larsen in the school hallway, the first embrace shows a prototypical mother nurturing a hurt child, but notice that Sterling does not surrender in the second embrace—"I’ve got to go," she insists. Perhaps she knows more about Rosie’s death than we realize, and her guilt makes her pull away. Or perhaps she hears the unspoken words in Mitch’s head: “Why not <em>you</em> instead of my Rosie?” And if Mitch had the power and divine connections of Demeter, you can imagine her dragging Sterling to Hades as trade for her daughter back. Plenty of precedents for such a negotiation exist in the mythology.<br />
<br />
<strong>An Aside:</strong> That I like Admiral Cain of <em>Battlestar Galactica</em> has always bothered me. To the humans who have survived the Cylon invasion, the Admiral is a bitch boss, not worthy of esteem. But what about the billions of citizens of the Twelve Colonies who died? Statistically, if I had existed in this fictional civilization, the Cylons would have exterminated me along with almost everyone else. I would not be aboard either the <em>Pegasus</em> or the <em>Galactica</em> having to deal with Admiral Cain’s questionable leadership. I would instead be wanting my death avenged. As the Cylons are “children” of humans, what I would need are the Erinnýes, or ancient Greek Furies, creatures who will, for example, chase and punish offspring who have murdered their parents. That is exactly the job Admiral Cain has undertaken in <em>BSG</em> and the reason many fans do not loathe the character. We recognize the vengeance she is providing for the billions who did not survive.</blockquote><h4>Yet Another Special Message to Mayoral Candidate Darren Richmond</h4><blockquote>Sorry. I apologize. <a href="http://tradeitin4twinkies.blogspot.com/2011/04/killing-first-thoughts-night-2.html">I underestimated you last week.</a> I'll try not to let that happen again.</blockquote><h4>Conspiracy at IMDB!</h4><blockquote><strong>Here's another crazy theory:</strong> Rosie's killer will be someone whose episode count is not yet complete at <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1637727/fullcredits#cast">IMDB</a>. As of today [<a href="https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0B8G-IGh7co6xZjAwZTIzN2ItMjBlNC00YmQ1LWI3NmUtZmM5MDYwZmY2OTc2&hl=en&authkey=CLDhl84O">Saturday, April 23</a>], Michelle Forbes as mother Mitch gets credit for all 13 episodes, but Brent Sexton as father Stan gets credit for only 6. The parents are usually together; Stan can't go missing for 7 episodes <em>unless we will have to consider him a suspect for Rosie's death!</em><br />
<br />
Notice that Eric Laden as Jamie Wright is at 13, but Billy Campbell as Councilman Richmond is at 7. We can't have the candidate missing for 6 episodes <em>unless we will have to consider him a suspect for Rosie's death!</em><br />
<br />
That means that Kris [Gharrett Patrick Paon] and Jasper [Richard Harmon] might not have made their final appearances; it's just that their episode count at IMDB is not yet accurate. When Kris dismisses Det. Holder with "That's what you've got?" he implies that more damaging evidence does exist. And when Kris admits that Jasper hated Rosie, you have to wonder if it's because Mr. Ames [who is not even listed on the IMDB page despite that slap he delivers on night 1] stole Rosie away as King Agamemnon does Achilles' slave girl.<br />
<br />
Anybody with 13 episodes of credit is now off my suspect list. But anyone with 7 or fewer is on!<br />
<br />
I am still wary of tech guy Nathan; Peter Benson's episode count is only 3.</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1466384445422602786.post-4874363614104965582011-04-16T23:01:00.004-04:002011-04-23T14:10:54.258-04:00The Killing :: First Thoughts :: Night 2<h4>Five-star Suffering</h4><blockquote>We seldom turn away from someone else's suffering. We rubberneck traffic accidents and watch <em>Survivor</em> contestants choke down bugs. We stare at the television as the evening news brings us pelicans gooped with oil struggling in the waves or stunned, begrimed earthquake/tsunami/hurricane/tornado/plane crash victims fighting to regain their equilibrium on camera.<br />
<br />
Why do we watch others suffer? Perhaps humans are a masochistic species, and when we reach an age when pulling legs off insects is no longer appropriate, we make do with the television spectacle of nature and technology rending limbs/babies/lives from other people. Or maybe the pain of those strangers lets us, the viewers, feel superior; we are special because our homes/loved ones/bodies are still safe. Or perhaps we are indeed connected on a psychic level, and rather than pleasure, a deep empathy draws us to watch.<br />
<br />
Mostly we catch drive-thru suffering—five minutes of a reporter covering a story before the network cuts to another commercial. We consume these moments quickly, just as we would the soft bun and meat of a cheeseburger. We don't savor them any more than we would linger over the sandwich in the greasy wax-paper wrap.<br />
<br />
<em>The Killing</em>, however, is fine-dining suffering. Its cast and crew are not looking to rush us. They want us parked at the table while they serve up pain so beautifully plated that we can't take our eyes away, so delectably complex that we take another forkful even when we've already had enough. <br />
<br />
On the second evening, I found myself hoping for a little palette-cleansing sorbet, especially after the scenes in the Larsen home, only to learn that the other two stories were sauce for the same course. When Linden admits that her own teenage years were wilder than even Regi [Annie Corley] suspected, we know what the detective is thinking: At one point in her own life, she might have met Rosie's fate. At campaign headquarters, when Councilman Richmond countermands the suggestion to send the Larsens white roses, we know that the baskets and wreaths generated by his own wife's death explain his decision. He knows that dying flowers contribute to a family's sorrow rather than diminish it. Just as Linden can see a younger version of herself drowned in the trunk of that car, Richmond can picture himself knocking around lost in the Larsen home. Those insights get garnished with Mitch's realization that her daughter did in fact suffer. For even if Rosie had been unconscious when the car went into the lake, as Linden indicated, Mitch—after her bathtub dunk—now knows that the water rushing into Rosie's lungs would have snapped the girl awake to the terror of impending death.<br />
<br />
Should I feel guilty enjoying this delicious human suffering so impeccably served?</blockquote><h4>Another Special Message to Mayoral Candidate Darren Richmond</h4><blockquote>Have you not heard the advice, "Keep your friends close, your enemies closer?" Firing campaign manager Jamie Wright [Eric Ladin] 23 days before the election was not a smart move. You have given an ax to grind to someone with intimate knowledge of your strategies and private life. Someone at your level should have enough political savvy to know this. If I were a citizen of this fictional Seattle, I'd be considering the incumbent for my vote, even if he is an environment-raping, money-swindling Republican.</blockquote><h4>Just-for-Fun Wild Prediction Certain to Be Wrong</h4><blockquote>Nathan [Peter Benson], the tech guy, killed Rosie after his sexual relationship with Jamie soured.</blockquote>Sparky Lightbulbhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06149685463468641829noreply@blogger.com0